SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Jhk) 1103

DEEPAK ROSHAN
Shekhar Jha – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Ms. Khusboo Kumari, Amicus
For the Opposite Party : Mr. Manoj Mishra.

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. This revision application is directed against the judgment dated 5.2.2004 passed by learned 3rd Addl. Sessions Judge, Deoghar in Criminal Appeal No.28 of 2003; whereby the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 10.3.2003 passed by the learned Assistant Sessions Judge-II, Deoghar in Sessions Case No.93 of 1993; whereby the petitioners have been acquitted u/s 307 IPC but petitioner No.1 has been convicted u/s 323 & 325 IPC and petitioner Nos.2 & 3 have been convicted u/s 324 IPC and sentenced were to undergo simple imprisonment for six months u/s 323 IPC and 2 years S.I. u/s 324 & 325 IPC and both the sentences were directed to run concurrently; has been affirmed against the petitioner Nos.2 and 3. So far as petitioner No.1 is concerned, considering his age the appellate court has modified his sentence and directed to release him on probation of good conduct for a period of two years on furnishing a bond with two sureties.

3. It is pertinent to mention here that as per service report petitioner No.1-Shekhar Jha has died. Hence, the instant application is dismissed as abated as against the petitioner No.1- Shekhar Jha.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top