Back
RAVINDRA MAITHANI
Rajendra Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Instant revision is preferred against the following:-
(a) Under Section 323 IPC, one year rigorous imprisonment.
(b) Under Section 452 IPC, two years rigorous imprisonment along with a fine of Rs.500/-, each.
(c) Under Section 506 IPC, one year rigorous imprisonment.
It has further been stipulated that all the sentences shall run concurrently. The Court has also directed that, in case of default of fine, the revisionist shall undergo one month further imprisonment and;
(ii) Judgment and order dated 19.05.2011, passed in Criminal Appeal No.42 of 2008, “Rajendra Singh and Others vs. State of Uttarakhand and Another”, by the Court of Additional District and Sessions Judge, Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar. By it, the conviction and sentence of the revisionists, as recorded in the case, has been upheld.
2. Instant revision was admitted o
The court has the discretion to release offenders on probation of good conduct instead of sentencing them immediately, considering factors such as age, nature of the offense, and absence of adverse c....
The court established that sentencing should consider the nature of the offence and the circumstances of the parties involved.
The court has the discretion to grant probation to first-time offenders based on factors such as age, lack of criminal antecedents, and the nature of the offense.
The court considered the revisionist's personal circumstances and lack of criminal antecedents in reducing the sentence under sections 380 and 411 IPC.
The court upheld the conviction under IPC Sections 323, 504, 341, and 509, while modifying the sentence to align with the interests of justice.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
