JUDGMENT :

ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. This writ petition has been filed for the following reliefs:

“(i) For issuance of an appropriate writs/orders/directions or a writ in nature of certiorari for quashing the Resolution contained in Memo No. 5/Arop-1-342/2014-26125 (HRMS) Ranchi dated 15.10.2019 (Annexure-12) by which the punishment for withholding three increments with cumulative effect has been imposed upon the petitioner under the provision of Rule 14(VI) of Jharkhand Government Servants (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 2016.

(ii) For issuance of an appropriate writs/orders/directions or a writ in nature of certiorari for quashing the Resolution contained in Memo No. 5/Aarop-1-342-2014-5451(HRMS) Ranchi dated 19.5.2020 (Annexure-13) by which the review application preferred by the petitioner has also been considered and punishment imposed by the disciplinary authority has not been interfered meaning thereby that the review application preferred by the petitioner was rejected. AND

(iii) For issuance of an appropriate writs/orders/directions or a writ in nature of mandamus commanding upon the respondents to provide all the three i