SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Jhk) 338

S. K. MISHRA, ANANDA SEN
State of Jharkhand – Appellant
Versus
Ram Kailash Singh, son of Late Deo Narayan Gope – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr. Sachin Kumar.

ORDER :

(S. K. Mishra, J.)

1. Heard learned counsel for the State as none appears on behalf of the respondent.

2. In this letters patent appeal, appellant has assailed the order passed by learned Single Judge on 03.09.2020 in W.P.(S) No.4708 of 2009.

3. Petitioner before the learned Single Judge, i.e., respondent before us, had initially prayed for a direction upon the respondent-authorities to pay arrears of pay since June, 2001. During pendency of the writ petition, petitioner was discharged from service pursuant to order contained in memo No.683 dated 12.05.2014 (Annexure 12 to the writ petition). After such change of event, the petitioner-respondent filed an application for amendment, which was allowed by learned Single Judge and the question of his termination and legality thereof was also considered. However, after considering the matter at length, learned Single Judge came to a conclusion that the petitioner has confined his argument only to the claim for payment of salary, therefore, he did not deal with the termination order. Further, the learned Single Judge has held that since the petitioner-respondent has worked for the period under consideration, i.e., June, 2001 till hi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top