Back
S. K. MISHRA, RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
Lalit Prasad Saw S/o Nakul Chandra Saw – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Upon hearing the learned counsel for the State, the Court made the following order, (per S.K. Mishra, C.J.)
2. In this writ application, the petitioners have prayed for the following relief:
And further direct the respondents to
The court established that under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, there cannot be a direction for regularization of services. The nature of appointment, acceptance of contractual terms, and ....
No judicial mandamus for blanket regularization of scheme para-teachers into cadre posts contrary to Art.309 rules reserving 50% quota; State directed to periodically notify/fill earmarked vacancies ....
Long service on a contractual basis does not confer a right to regularization or equal pay as per established legal principles.
Equal treatment in employment is required under Articles 14 and 16, necessitating fair regularization processes for all similarly situated individuals.
The court upheld the principle of judicial consistency by disposing of the writ petition in accordance with a prior judgment regarding the regularization of Para Teachers.
The court emphasized the need for fair and non-discriminatory treatment in the regularization of services, in line with the principles of equality enshrined in Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution ....
The court directed the State to formulate a regularization scheme for Post Graduate Teachers under Samagra Shiksha Abhiyan, emphasizing the need for consultation with the Central Government.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
