PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Satyam Singh @ Satyam Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. Apprehending their arrest in connection with Tarhasi P.S. Case No. 13 of 2022 instituted under Sections 341, 323, 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail.
3. As per FIR, allegation is that on 23.03.2022 at about 1:00 p.m. the petitioners in furtherance of their common intention along with other co-villagers dragged out from the house to the informant’s father and brought towards the road side brutally assaulting him due to which he succumbed to injuries.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence at all rather they have been falsely implicated in this case due to village politics. No specific overt act has been attributed against the petitioners and no weapon of offence has been recovered from the possession of petitioners. As per P.M. report of deceased, no external or internal injuries have been found on the body of the deceased. Petitioners have no criminal antecedents. Co-accused with similar allegation has already been extended privilege of anticipatory bail by this Court vide o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.