E. V. VENUGOPAL
B. Rajashekar – Appellant
Versus
T. S. Police Housing Corporation Ltd. , Hyderabad, Rep. by its Managing Director – Respondent
ORDER :
Heard Sri V.Jagapathi, learned senior counsel for the petitioners in all the writ petitions and Sri Nyayapati Prashant, learned standing counsel for TSPHCL and the learned Government Pleader for Home. Perused the material available on record.
2. Since the core issue involved in all these writ petitions is one and the same, all these writ petitions are being disposed of by this common order.
3. The case of the petitioners in all these writ petitions is that all the petitioners were selected by the Selection Committee in pursuance of the recruitment notification issued by the 1st respondent and in pursuance to the letter dated 17.08.2012 all the petitioners were appointed to the post of Site Engineers Graduate (Civil), Site Engineer/Junior Assistants (Temp.) and site Engineer Diploma (Civil) respectively on contract basis initially for a period of 11 months on consolidated remuneration. It is the further case of the petitioners that the notification did not specify that the recruitment for appointment to the posts of Site Engineers and Junior Assistants are on contract basis or on consolidated pay basis. Moreover the period of appointments were restricted for a period not exceed
Ashwani Kumar and Ors., v. State of Bihar and Ors.
Delhi Development Horticulture Employees' Union v. Delhi Administration
Jacob M. Puthuparambil Vs. Kerala Water Authority
K.Venkateswara Rao Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and others
Karnataka State Private College Stop-Gap Lecturers Association Vs. State of Karnataka and others
Khagesh Kumar and Ors. vs. Inspector General of Registration and Ors.
Secretary, State of Karnataka vs. Umadevi and others
Contractual employees cannot claim regularization as a matter of right; their employment is project-based and temporary, governed by specific contractual terms.
Contractual employees may not claim regularization based on prolonged service or failed applications for higher posts, as employment must adhere to constitutional recruitment mandates.
Regularization of services for employees who have served for over ten years is a right that must be considered by the state, provided there are no valid objections, and the state must adhere to its o....
Temporary or casual employment does not confer legal rights to regularization; adherence to proper recruitment processes is mandatory for permanent appointments.
Continuous long service in essential roles grants employees the right to regularization despite initial contractual labels, promoting equity in employment practices.
Long-term contractual employees performing essential work are entitled to regularization despite prior undertakings barring such claims, as continuous service establishes the need for employment righ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.