JUDGMENT :

Heard Mr. A.K. Kashyap, learned Senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mrs. Vandana Bharti, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State in Criminal Revision No.975 of 2012.

2. Heard Mr. Ashok Sinha, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Santosh Kumar Shukla, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State in Cr. Rev. No.1011 of 2012.

3. Heard Mr. Nilesh Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Ms. Priya Shrestha, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State in Cr. Rev. No.924 of 2012.

4. These batch of criminal revision applications have been filed against the judgment dated 03.09.2012 passed in Criminal Appeal No.58 of 2010 along with Criminal Appeal No.61 of 2010, Criminal Appeal No.62 of 2010 and Criminal Appeal No.64 of 2010 by the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge – II, Bokaro whereby the learned appellate court has partly allowed Criminal Appeal No.62 of 2010 to the extent that the conviction and sentence of Mejar Singh under Section 392 of Indian Penal Code was set aside and his c