IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
APARESH KUMAR SINGH, DEEPAK ROSHAN, JJ.
Ashwini Kumar Tiwari & Ors. - Petitioners
Versus
Union of India, through Comptroller and Auditor General of India & Ors. - Respondents
W.P.(T) No. 1431 of 2017
Decided On : 05-07-2022
Pay Fixation - Re-Employment of Ex-Servicemen - CCS (RP) Rules, 2008 - OM dated 05.04.2010 - Para 4(a), 4(b)(i), 4(b)(ii), 4(d) - The court discussed the relevant provisions of the office memorandum dated 05.04.2010 and held that the fixation of pay at the entry level for re-employed pensioners, including ex-servicemen, is in accordance with the rules.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners, ex-servicemen re-employed as Auditors, sought direction to refix their pay at the entry level as per their last pay drawn, ignoring pension and other benefits, based on the office memorandum dated 05.04.2010. The tribunal upheld the pay fixation at the entry level, and the petitioners appealed to the court.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioners' case was governed by para 4(b)(i) of the OM dated 05.04.2010, which provides for fixing the initial pay on re-employment as per the entry pay in the revised pay structure of the re-employed post, ignoring pension. The court upheld the tribunal's decision, stating that the fixation of pay at the entry level was in accordance with the rules.
Issues: The main issue was the applicability of the relevant provisions of the office memorandum dated 05.04.2010 to the petitioners' case, specifically whether their pay should be refixed at the entry level as per their last pay drawn or as per the entry pay in the revised pay structure of the re-employed post.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the petitioners' case fell under para 4(b)(i) of the OM dated 05.04.2010, which stipulates that the initial pay on re-employment shall be fixed as per the entry pay in the revised pay structure of the re-employed post, ignoring pension. The court found no error in the tribunal's application of the relevant rules and office memorandum.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the tribunal's judgment on the fixation of pay at the entry level for the re-employed ex-servicemen, in accordance with the rules.
JUDGMENT :
All the writ petitioners were applicants in O.A. No. 103 of 2015 being Ex-servicemen who after retirement from Indian Air Force joined as Auditor in P.B-I (5200-20200) with grade pay of Rs.2800/-.
2. The applicants/petitioners joined as Auditor on 17.01.2013, 05.12.2012 and 21.12.2012, respectively i.e. after 01.01.2006. Their pay at the entry level was fixed at Rs.8560/- + Grade pay of Rs.2800/- against which they represented. However, since their grievances were not redressed by the respondents, they approached the learned CAT for a direction upon the respondents to refix the pay of the applicants in the pay band of Rs.5200-20200/- with entry grade pay of Rs.2800/- at par with their last pay drawn which includes pay in pay-band, grade pay, military service pay, good conduct badge pay, classification pay and X-pay ignoring pension and other benefits as per the office memorandum dated 05.04.2010 along with arrears with admissible interest from the date of their appointments. The plea was contested by the respondents. Both the parties placed their case on the basis of the DOP&T Office Memorandum No. 3/19/2009-Estt. (pay-II) dated 05.04.2010 on the subject “Applicability of CCS (RP) Rules, 2008, to person re-employed in Government service after retirement and whose pay is debitable to Civil Estimates.”
3. Learned Tribunal discussed the relevant provisions of the office memorandum and also the revised provision in the form of a table and arrived at the following findings:-
“(i) The undersigned is directed to refer to this Department’s O.M. No. 3/13/2008-Estt. (Pay II) dated 11th November 2008 on the above-mentioned subject. Certain references have been received seeking clarification regarding the manner of fixation of pay of retired Defence Forces personnel/officers re-employed in Central Government Civilian post, after the implementation of CCS (EP) Rules, 2008. This has been considered in consultation with Department of Expenditure. The pay fixation of reemployed pensioners on re-employment in Central Government, including that of Defence Forces personnel/officers, is being done in accordance with CCS (Fixation of pay of re-employed pensioners) Orders, 1986, issued vide this Department’s O.M. No. 3/1895-Estt. (Pay II) dated 31st July, 1986 (as revised from time to time).
(ii) After the introduction of the system of running pay bands and grade pays, it has been decided to amend the relevant provisions of CCS (fixation of pay of re-employed pensioners) orders, 1986, in the manner indicated in the table.”
9. Thus, it is clear that the provisions of CCS (Fixation of Pay of Reemployed Pensioners) Orders, 1986 (dated 31.07.1986; which has also been referred by the applicants) has already been subsumed in the aforesaid OM dated 05.04.2010. Therefore, this OM is a self-contained instrument/authority governing the fixation of pay of reemployed pensioners. Within the larger class of the re-employed pensioners in general there is a subset of ex-serviceman for whom specific provisions have been mentioned in the table following the above two paragraphs. Therefore, we are extracting the provisions of the table applicable in the case of present applicants.
| Existing Provision | Proposed revised provision |
| Para 4 (a): Re-employed pensioners shall be allowed to draw pay only in the prescribed scales of pay of the posts in which they are re-employed. No protection of the scales of pay of the posts held by them prior to retirement shall | |
Incorrect pay fixation for ex-servicemen due to non-application of Military Service Pay (MSP) principles after re-employment is not permissible under existing administrative guidelines.
Pay fixation for re-employed ex-servicemen must protect total emoluments rather than individual pay components, ensuring no injustice occurs due to varying pay structures.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the Central Administrative Tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction by converting itself into an administrative authority and issuing directions out....
The court upheld the authority's reduction of the petitioner's pay due to prior erroneous fixation, confirming compliance with the Central Civil Services Rules while quashing the recovery order.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.