SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Satish Chandra Sharma, Subramonium Prasad, JJ.
Tejpal Singh Maan - Appellant
Versus
Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi - Respondent
W.P.(C) 14339 of 2005 and C.M. No. 7956 of 2020
Decided On : 11-10-2022




The court upheld the authority's reduction of the petitioner's pay due to prior erroneous fixation, confirming compliance with the Central Civil Services Rules while quashing the recovery order.

Headnote:(A) Central Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 1997 - Fixation of pay - Petitioner, a TGT, challenged reduction of pay from Rs.6900 to Rs.6500 by the competent authority based on his option for revised pay scale - The Tribunal upheld the reduction noting that the initial fixation was erroneous and contravened the relevant rules. (Paras 5, 6, 30, 36)

(B) Administrative Law - Principles of Natural Justice - The court observed that the principle was followed as the petitioner was given notice and an opportunity to respond before the final decision. (Paras 8, 12, 36)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner was a TGT receiving pay at certain rates and opted for revised pay, initially fixed incorrectly. Despite multiple representations, his pay was subsequently reduced after notice, invoking Rule 9 of the aforementioned rules.

Findings of Court:
The court affirmed the authority's decision to reduce the petitioner’s pay to Rs.6500, citing compliance with established rules and correction of prior errors during pay fixation.

Issues: The court considered the validity of the pay fixation and the adherence to the petitioner’s rights under applicable regulations.

Ratio Decidendi: The fixation was correctly aligned with Rule 7 of the CCS (Revised Pay) Rules, 1997, and observed that the higher pay scale could not apply retroactively to the post held from an earlier referenced date.

Result: Petition dismissed; pay fixation upheld, recovery quashed.

JUDGMENT

Satish Chandra Sharma, C.J. The present writ petition is arising out of an order dated 07.12.2004, passed in O.A. No. 704/2004 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) rejecting the Original Application preferred by the Petitioner. The facts of the case reveal that the Petitioner, at the relevant point of time, was serving Trained Graduate Teacher (Science), (TGT (Science) for short) at Government Boys Senior Secondary School No.1 Shaktinagar, Delhi-7 and he was granted a time bound senior scale of TGT on 10.03.1996 on completion of 12 years of qualifying service in the entry scale of TGT and his basic pay was fixed at Rs.2000/- in the pay scale of Rs.1640-2900. That the Central Civil Services Revised Pay Scale Rules, 1997, came into force in September/October 1997. However, the pay scales were upgraded w.e.f. 01.01.1996.

2. The Rules of 1997 provided that when the pay of a Government Servant is brought over to the revised scale from a date later than 01.01.1996 his pay from such later date is to be fixed under the Fundamental Rules and not as provided under Rule 7 of the CCS Revised Pay Rules 1997.

3. The Government of India issued an Office Memorandum dated 26.03.1998 and the same provided that the pay of the Government employees who opt to switch over to the revised pay between 01.01.1996 and 31.12.1996, in respect of the post held by him on 01.01.1996. will also be fixed as per Rule 7of the CCS Revised Pay Rules, 1997. The Office Memorandum dated 26.03.1998 is reproduced as under:

"No.16(1)/16/98

Govt. of India

Ministry of Finance

Department of Expenditure

New Delhi; the March 26, 1998

Chaitra 5,1920 (Saka)

OFFICE MEMORANDUM

    Sub: Central Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rule, 1997

    Fixation of pay of Government servants who opt for

    The revised scale of pay from a date subsequent to 1.1.1996

    In terms of the provisions contained in Rule 9 of the Central Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 1997, where a Government servant continues to draw his pay in the existing scale of pay and is brought over to the revised scale from a date later than the 1st day of January 1996, his pay from the later date in the Revised Scale is to be fixed under the Fundamental Rules and under Rule 7 of the said Rules.

    On further consideration and in exercise of the power available under Rule 13 of the Central Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 1997, the President is pleased to decide that the pay of Government Servants who opt to switch over to the revised scale of pay from the date of their next increment falling after 1.1.1996 not later than 31.12.1996 in respect of the post held by them on 1.1.1996 shall be fixed in accordance with the provisions of Rule 7 of the Central Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 1997.

    The option in the format appended as the Second Schedule to the Central Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 1997 may be exercised within 3 months from the date of issue of this O.M. The option once exercised shall be final. The option now provided under these orders can be exercised afresh even by those Government servants who have already exercised their option prior to the issue of these orders to switch over to the revised scales.

    However, the pay of Government Servants who opt to switch over to the revised scales.

    a) from date of increment falling subsequent to 31.12.1996 or

    b) from any date after 1.1.1996, for reasons other than their date of increment falling during 1996.

    Shall be fixed under Rule 9 of the Central Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 1997

    Ministry of Home affairs etc. are requested to bring the contents of these orders to the notice of all concerned expeditiously within time so that the need for extending the date of exercising an option under these orders may not arise

    In so far as persons serving in the Indian Audit & Accounts Department are concerned, these issue after consultation with the Comptroller & Auditor General of India.

    Hindi version is enclosed.

Sd/-

(Arvind Kumar)

Deputy Secretary to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top