S. N. PATHAK
Hari Kishore Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Heard the parties.
2. Since the common issues are involved in these batch of matters, the same are being heard and disposed of by the common order.
3. Apart from several prayers as made in the individual writ petitions, the common prayers in all these writ petitions are for a direction upon the respondents particularly the Respondent No. 7 to 9 (in W.P.S. No. 3017 of 2021) to refund the contribution of the petitioners in the head of Provident Fund in the G.P.F. Account of the petitioner pursuant to old pension scheme which will be provided to the petitioner along with GPF Account Number since the petitioner has opted for the same.
Further prayer has been made for quashing Clause-3 of Resolution vide letter No. 143 dated 05.09.2022, which states that,
^^03- ,u,lMh,y }kjk ljdkjh lsod ds va'knku dh jkf'k fdlh Hkh fLFkfr es izkIr u gksus ij jkT; ljdkj ls bldk nkok ugh fd;k tk ldsxkA^^
And the Clause 3 of format of the said Affidavit enclosed as the Annexure-1 of notification No. 148 dated 21.09.2022 as well, wherein it has been stated that,
^^03- ,u,lMh,y ls esjs va'knku dh jkf'k fdlh Hkh fLFkfr es izkIr u gksus dh fLFkfr es esjs }kjk jkT; ljdkj ls bldk nkok ugh fd;k tk ldsxkA^^
T
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.