IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.
Akash Kumar Hazari @ Akash Hazari, Son of Umesh Kumar Hazari - Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand and Ors. - Opposite Parties
Cr. M.P. No.1359 of 2023
Decided On : 12-05-2023
Section 482 - Quashing of Criminal Proceedings - Indian Penal Code - 323, 341, 307, 354, 448, 504, 506 & 34
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought to quash the criminal proceeding arising from various sections of the Indian Penal Code, citing a compromise between the parties and lack of evidence against the petitioner.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the case was at a nascent stage of investigation, and the compromise between the parties warranted quashing of the criminal proceeding.
Issues: The issues revolved around the applicability of Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the nature of the alleged offences, and the impact of the compromise on the continuation of the criminal proceeding.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the principles laid down by the Supreme Court, emphasizing that the power under Section 482 should be exercised sparingly and with caution, and that the possibility of conviction, nature of the offence, and timing of the settlement are crucial factors in deciding whether to quash criminal proceedings.
Final Decision: The court quashed the entire criminal proceeding, considering the compromise between the parties and the lack of evidence supporting the alleged offences.
JUDGMENT :
Heard the parties.
2. This Cr.M.P. has been filed invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure with a prayer to quash the entire criminal proceeding arising out of Katras P.S. Case No.32 of 2021 dated 04.02.2021 registered for the offences punishable under Section 323, 341, 307, 354, 448, 504, 506 & 34 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad.
3. Drawing attention of this Court to the copy of the certified copy of the petition for compromise jointly filed by the petitioner, informant and the victim, in the court of Sessions Judge, Dhanbad, it is jointly submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the opposite party No.2 that upon the intervention of common friends and well-wishers, the parties have settled their dispute amicably. It is next submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 that the petitioner and the opposite party no.2 are residents of the same locality and because of some misunderstanding, this case was instituted. It is then submitted that in view of the compromise between the parties, the informant does not want to proceed with the case and the petitioner is a student of Bachelor of Arts. It is then submitted that the offence punishable under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code is not made out even if the allegation against the petitioner as made out in the F.I.R. is accepted in its entirety to be true. It is next submitted that there is no direct or serious allegation bestowed upon the petitioner and during the investigation of the case, no material has been collected by the I.O. to show the complicity of the petitioner in this case and charge sheet has not yet been submitted. It is further submitted that there is no material in the record to suggest that the offence punishable under Section 354 of the Indian Penal Code is made out against the petitioner. It is next submitted that there is no allegation of any weapon being used in the alleged occurrence. It is next submitted that unless the entire criminal proceeding arising out of Katras P.S. Case No.32 of 2021 dated 04.02.2021 registered for the offences punishable under Section 323, 341, 307, 354, 448, 504, 506 & 34 of the Indian Penal Code is quashed and set aside, the petitioner will be highly prejudiced.
4. The learned Spl. P.P. submits that in view of the compromise between the parties, the entire criminal proceeding arising out of Katras P.S. Case No.32 of 2021 dated 04.02.2021 registered for the offences punishable under Section 323, 341, 307, 354, 448, 504, 506 & 34 of the Indian Penal Code be quashed and set aside.
5. Having heard the rival submissions made at the Bar and after going through the materials in the record, it is crystal clear that the case is at the nascent stage of investigation only and charge sheet has not yet been submitted. It is a settled principle of law as has been held by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in the case of Narinder Singh and Others vs. State of Punjab & Another reported in (2014) 6 SCC 466 paragraphs-29 of which read as under:-
29.1. Power conferred under Section 482 of the Code is to be distinguished from the power which lies in the Court to compound the offences under Section 320 of the Code. No doubt, under Section 482 of the Code, the High Court has inherent power to quash the criminal proceedings even in those cases which are not compoundable, where the parties have settled the matter between themselve
The main legal point established is that the power under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure should be exercised sparingly and with caution, considering the nature of the offence, possibili....
The court emphasized the need to secure ends of justice and prevent abuse of the court's process when considering settlement between parties and quashing criminal proceedings.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the High Court has the inherent power to quash criminal proceedings under Section 482 of the Code, especially when the parties have settled th....
The central legal point established is that the power to quash a criminal proceeding should be exercised to prevent abuse of process of law and to secure the ends of justice, particularly in cases wi....
The High Court can quash criminal proceedings under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure if the parties have settled their disputes, provided the offences are not heinous and the continuatio....
The court quashed the FIR based on a compromise between parties, emphasizing that continuation of proceedings would cause injustice and that the possibility of conviction was remote.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the careful consideration of factors such as the nature of the offence, the timing of settlement, and the possibility of conviction when exercising....
Criminal Law – Quash of Criminal proceedings - Power conferred under Section 482 of the Code is to be distinguished from the power which lies in the Court to compound the offences under Section 320 o....
Criminal Law – Offence of Attempt to Murder – Sought for quash of FIR – Amicable Settlement between parties - Criminal proceedings for offence under Section 307 IPC and/or the Arms Act, etc. which ha....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.