IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.
Md. Muslim Mian, son of late Sobrati Mian – Appellant
Versus
The State of Jharkhand - Respondent
Cr.M.P. No. 2866 of 2023
Decided on : 22-11-2023
Section 482 Cr.P.C. - Quashing of Criminal Proceedings - Indian Penal Code - Sections 341, 323, 307, 504 and 34 - [SUMMARY OF ACT SECTIONS REFERENCED AND DISCUSSED]
Fact of the Case:
The case involved a petition to quash criminal proceedings for offences under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The parties had amicably settled their dispute, and the petitioners sought to quash the proceedings based on the settlement.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the parties had voluntarily settled their dispute and that the possibility of conviction of the petitioners was remote and bleak. It concluded that continuation of the case would cause oppression and prejudice to the accused-petitioners, amounting to an abuse of the process of law. Therefore, the court quashed the entire criminal proceeding in connection with the case, specifically for the petitioners.
Issues: The main issue was whether the settlement between the parties warranted the quashing of the criminal proceedings, especially considering the nature of the offences charged.
Ratio Decidendi: The court applied the principles laid down by the Supreme Court of India in Narinder Singh and Others vs. State of Punjab & Another (2014) 6 SCC 466, which emphasized the factors to be considered when accepting a settlement and quashing criminal proceedings under Section 482 of the Code. The court specifically considered the nature of the offences, the possibility of conviction, and the timing of the settlement.
Final Decision: The court allowed the Criminal Miscellaneous Petition and quashed the order and entire criminal proceeding in connection with the case for the petitioners only.
JUDGMENT :
By the Court:- Heard the parties.
2. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. with a prayer for quashing the order dated 02.05.2022 by which cognizance has been taken for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504 and 34 of Indian Penal Code and the entire criminal proceeding in connection with the Barkagaon (Dari O.P.) P.S. case no. 237 of 2020, corresponding to G.R. No. 859 of 2022, now pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Hazaribag.
3. It is jointly submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 by drawing attention of the court to the Annexure 5 at page 41-47 of the brief, which is the copy of the certified copy of the joint compromise petition filed by the parties in the court of Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Hazaribagh that therein it has been mentioned that the petitioners and the opposite party no.2 are residents of the same village and are living as neighbours and due to some mistake, the case was instituted and after realizing the same, the parties have compromised the case. It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the allegations are general and omnibus in nature and the offence punishable under Section 307 of Indian Penal Code was not made out nor police submitted charge sheet for the offences punishable under Section 307 of Indian Penal Code but the learned Magistrate inadvertently, because of clerical error has mentioned the offence punishable under Section 307 of Indian Penal Code at the time of taking cognizance, by also mentioning that police submitted charge sheet against the petitioner inter alia for the offence punishable under section 307 of the Indian Penal Code but in fact, the charge sheet has been submitted for the offence punishable under Section 341, 323, 504 and 34 of Indian Penal Code only. It is further submitted that in view of the full and final settlement between the petitioners and the opposite party no.2, the opposite party no.2 is not desirous to proceed with the case; hence the chance of the conviction of the petitioners is remote and bleak. It is therefore submitted that continuation of the criminal proceeding will amount to abuse of the process of the law. It is lastly submitted that the said order dated 02.05.2022 and the entire criminal proceeding in connection with the Barkagaon (Dari O.P.) P.S. case no. 237 of 2020, corresponding to G.R. No. 859 of 2022, be quashed and set aside.
4. Having heard the submissions made at the Bar and after going through the materials available in the record, it is pertinent to mention here that the Hon’ble Supreme court of India in the case of Narinder Singh and Others vs. State of Punjab & Another reported in (2014) 6 SCC 466, in paragraph 29, has laid down the principles by which, the high court would be guided in giving adequate treatment to the settlement between the parties, and exercising its power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. while accepting the settlement and quashing the proceedings which, reads as under:
29.1. Power conferred under Section 482 of the Code is to be distinguished from the power which lies in the Court to compound the offences under Section 320 of the Code. No doubt, under Section 482 of the Code, the High Court has inherent power to quash the criminal proceedings even in those cases which are not compoundable, where the parties have settled the matter between themselves. However, this power is to be exercised sparingly and with cauti
Narinder Singh and Others vs. State of Punjab & Another reported in (2014) 6 SCC 466
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the High Court has the inherent power to quash criminal proceedings under Section 482 of the Code, especially when the parties have settled th....
The main legal point established is that the power under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure should be exercised sparingly and with caution, considering the nature of the offence, possibili....
The court established that settlements between parties can lead to the quashing of criminal proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C., especially when the case has a civil character and the possibility o....
High Court quashed proceedings under inherent powers upon parties' settlement in petty neighbourhood dispute over cattle grazing, as conviction remote, continuation abuses process, following guidelin....
The court emphasized the need to secure ends of justice and prevent abuse of the court's process when considering settlement between parties and quashing criminal proceedings.
The court quashed the FIR based on a compromise between parties, emphasizing that continuation of proceedings would cause injustice and that the possibility of conviction was remote.
The court can quash criminal proceedings when a private dispute is resolved through compromise, indicating a remote chance of conviction and preventing abuse of the legal process.
The High Court can quash criminal proceedings under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure if the parties have settled their disputes, provided the offences are not heinous and the continuatio....
The court's decision was influenced by the principles that the High Court should be guided by in giving adequate treatment to the settlement between the parties and exercising its power under Section....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.