S. N. PATHAK
Sunita Mehta – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand through the Secretary, School, Education and Literacy Department – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Heard the parties.
2. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner assailed the order of cancellation of her appointment to the post of Assistant Teacher.
3. The petitioner was appointed as Graduated Trained Language Para Teacher on 23.05.2003. It is the case of the petitioner that in the year 2013, an advertisement was floated for appointment of 302 Assistant Teachers. Since the petitioner was eligible for said post, she applied to the same having requisite qualification. The petitioner had also cleared Teachers Eligibility Test conducted by Jharkhand Academic Council for Class 1 to 5 and 6 to 8. In the process of selection, petitioner appeared and was declared fit and suitable for appointment to the post of Assistant Teacher and the name of the petitioner was recommended for appointment. Thereafter, petitioner was waiting for formal letter of appointment but the same was denied vide order dated 04.10.2016 (Annexure-3).
Aggrieved by the said rejection order, the petitioner has been constrained to knock the door of this Court.
4. Mr. L.C.N. Shahedeo, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner argues that impugned order is not tenable in the eyes of law. Learned counsel subm
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.