Back
SARAL SRIVASTAVA
Himanshi Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Order on Amendment Application No.4/2021
Learned counsel for the petitioner through the present amendment application is seeking permission to incorporate the following prayer and the same may be treated as part of the writ petition.
Because the amendment sought is formal, therefore, the amendment application is allowed.
Learned counsel for the petitioner/applicant is permitted to carry out the necessary amendment within one week from today.
Order on Writ Petition
1. Heard Sri Ashok Khare, learned Senior Advocate, assisted by Sri Siddharth Khare, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Vikram Bahadur Yadav, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent nos. 1 & 2 and Sri B.K. Yadav learned counsel for respondents nos.3 & 4.
2. The petitioner through the present writ petition, has prayed for quashing of notice dated 02.01.2021 issued by the Basic Shiksha Adhikari, Firozabad, and a writ o
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the degrees obtained by the petitioner during the same academic year were in violation of UGC Regulations and could not be considered as valid....
A candidate's employment cannot be terminated based on allegations of overlapping degrees unless those degrees are declared null and void by the competent educational authority.
Dual degrees via distance education in different timelines (academic/calendar years) without simultaneity qualify for teacher appointment.
The court emphasized the necessity of procedural fairness and the validity of educational qualifications when considering appointment cases.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the qualifications required for appointment as a trained Teacher in Secondary School do not necessarily mandate a specific graduation subject,....
Point of law: Merely, because another view or a better view is possible, there should be no interference with or disturbance of the order passed by the Single Judge, unless both sides agree for a fai....
Point of law: A criterion which has the effect of denying a candidate his right to be considered for the post on the principle that he is having higher qualification than prescribed cannot be rationa....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
