Back
ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Dhaneshwar Mahto, S/o Late Samal Mahto – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.
I.A. no. 1232 of 2024
Heard the parties.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that this interlocutory application has been filed with a prayer to allow the petitioners for amendment in para no. 1 and prayer portion of the main criminal miscellaneous petition by making the additional prayer of quashing the order dated 11.06.2020, which has wrongly been printed as 11.06.2022 in para 1 of this interlocutory application by which, cognizance for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 323, 324, 325, 307, 341, 506, and 34 of the IPC as well as the entire criminal proceeding against the petitioner; on the ground that his same being illegal and against the settled principle of law; in connection with Thakurgaon P.S. case no. 61 of 2019 corresponding to G.R. case no. 1331 of 2020 (S.T. no. 515 of 2021), hence it is submitted that the prayer for amendment be allowed.
Considering the aforesaid facts, the prayer is allowed and the petitioners are directed to incorporate the amendment with Red Ink in the criminal miscellaneous petition, during the course of the day.
This interlocutory application is disposed of accordingly.
Cr.M.P. No. 1394 of 2023
1. This
The court established that settlements between parties can lead to the quashing of criminal proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C., especially when the case has a civil character and the possibility o....
The High Court can quash criminal proceedings based on settlement between parties if continuation poses an injustice, especially in non-heinous, private disputes.
High Court quashed proceedings under inherent powers upon parties' settlement in petty neighbourhood dispute over cattle grazing, as conviction remote, continuation abuses process, following guidelin....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the High Court has the inherent power to quash criminal proceedings under Section 482 of the Code, especially when the parties have settled th....
The court can quash criminal proceedings when a private dispute is resolved through compromise, indicating a remote chance of conviction and preventing abuse of the legal process.
The High Court has the power to quash criminal proceedings based on compromise, especially in cases of private disputes where the possibility of conviction is remote and bleak.
The court quashed the FIR based on a compromise between parties, emphasizing that continuation of proceedings would cause injustice and that the possibility of conviction was remote.
High Court quashed proceedings under inherent powers for non-heinous private land dispute offences including attempt to murder, post-compromise at investigation stage, as injuries simple, conviction ....
The High Court can quash criminal proceedings under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure if the parties have settled their disputes, provided the offences are not heinous and the continuatio....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
