SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Jhk) 297

GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Veena Verma – Appellant
Versus
Snigdha Sinha – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant(s) : Mr. Rahul Kumar Gupta.
For the Respondent:Mr. Manjul Prasad, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Baban Prasad.

JUDGMENT :

Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J.

Heard, learned counsel for the parties.

1. Respondents/Plaintiffs, the sons of Onkar Prasad Verma from his first wife, filed Partition Suit No. 166 of 2000 for division of joint family properties of Onkar Prasad Verma, impleading Smt. Veena Verma (appellant /Defendant No.1) second wife of Onkar Prasad Verma.

2. Smt. Veena Verma had earlier filed Probate Case no.156 of 1999, for probate of ‘WILL’ executed by her husband Late Onkar Prasad Verma against her three step sons. The probate application was contested and it was converted into Title Suit No. 1 of 2003.

3. Partition Suit No.166 of 2000 and Title Suit No.01 of 2003 were heard together and have been disposed of by common Judgment, wherein the partition suit has been decreed, whereas the application for probate was rejected.

4. Aggrieved by the Judgment and decree of partition, F.A. No.188 of 2008 has been filed and against dismissal of probate application, M.A. No. 320 of 2008 has been preferred by Smt. Veena Verma.

5. F.A. No.103 of 2011 has been filed against the final decree drawn in partition suit no.166 of 2000 dated 24.05.2011 (decree signed on 19.07.2011) passed by learned Addl. Judicial Co

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top