Back
SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
Chandra Shekhar Prasad Singh, S/o. Late Ram Ashirvad Singh – Appellant
Versus
Jharkhand State Electricity Board, Ranchi – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, whereby and whereunder, the order of punishment dated 31.07.2009 has been assailed with a direction to disburse the arrears which has been withheld in pursuance of the punishment of withholding of one annual increment.
2. The brief facts of the case as per the pleading made in the writ petition which requires to be enumerated, read as under:
The petitioner retired as Meter Reader on 31.05.2014 at the relevant time he was working at Electric Supply Ranchi.
Against the petitioner, departmental proceeding was started vide officer order no.694 dated 19.04.2008 as per which altogether 3 charges had been leveled against the petitioner. One enquiry officer was appointed and the petitioner after getting information in that context had appeared and filed his reply along all relevant documents.
That the said Enquiring Officer after scrutinizing all relevant points as well as documents brought in his notice by the petitioner exonerated the petitioner from all three charges as apparent from enquiring report submitted by him on 22.07.2008
Thereafter, the Disciplinary Authorit
The court refused to remit the matter for a de novo enquiry due to the prolonged duration of the disciplinary proceedings and the impending retirement of the appellant. The punishment imposed was fou....
The court emphasized the necessity of adhering to principles of natural justice in disciplinary inquiries, asserting that findings must be supported by adequate evidence and fair procedures.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the limited scope of interference in disciplinary proceedings, emphasizing the need for evidence-based findings and the principles of proportionali....
Judicial review of disciplinary matters is limited, with courts respecting the wide discretion of disciplinary authorities unless procedural fairness is violated or penalties shock the conscience.
The main legal point established in the given judgment is that the power of judicial review discharged by the High Court under Article 226 is distinct from the Appellate power exercised by a Departme....
Natural justice requires meaningful opportunity for defense in disciplinary inquiries; failure to adhere justifies annulment of punitive orders.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
