SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
Rites Limited – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
Heard Mr. Vikas Pandey, the learned counsel assisted by Mr. Sanjay Kumar Prasad, Mr. Piyush Poddar and Mr. Janak Kumar Mishra, the learned counsels, appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Mrinal Kanti Roy, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent-Jharkhand Urja Vikas Nigam Limited (JUVNL).
2. The prayer in this petition has been made to appoint impartial sole-arbitrator with regard to 10-agreements being no.01 to 10/RE/JSEB/03-04 all dated 16.03.2004 entered between the RITES Limited, a Government of India Undertaking and Jharkhand State Electricity Board [now, Jharkhand Urja Vikas Nigam Limited (JUVNL)].
3. Mr. Vikas Pandey, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a Government of India Undertaking under the Ministry of Railways and a Government Company and all its Directors and most of its share-holders are citizens of India. He further submits that Jharkhand State Electricity Board (JSEB) is a Body constituted under the Indian Electricity Act, 1910 and is a
Nabam Rebia and Bamang Felix v. Deputy Speaker, Arunachal Pradesh Legislative Assembly
CCE v. Bharat Petroleum Corpn. Ltd.
Electronics Corpn. of India Ltd. v. Union of India
Harbhajan Singh v. State of Punjab
Hemani Malhotra -vs- High Court of Delhi
National Insurance Company Limited v. Pranay Sethi
Northern Coalfields Limited v. Heaving Engineering Corporation Limited and Another
Oil and Natural Gas Commission v. CCE
ONGC Ltd. v. City and Industrial Development Corpn. Maharashtra Ltd.
State of Haryana and Others v. G.D. Goenka Tourism Corporation Limited and Another
Tej Prakash Pathak & Ors. -vs- Rajasthan High Court and Others
The Supreme Court ruled that the absence of clearance from the Committee on Disputes does not invalidate the right to file a suit, and that disputes between government corporations should be adjudica....
The designated seat of arbitration establishes exclusive jurisdiction for related applications, affirming that the Commercial Court in Ranchi has jurisdiction over Section 34 applications.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of written consent for arbitration, the effect of the appointment of an arbitrator, and the availability of statutory remedies under....
Fresh appointment of Arbitrator – Once Arbitral Award finally decided dispute which was subject matter of reference, there is no need of appointment of another Sole Arbitrator.
Point of Law : Exercise of judicial power under Section 11 (6A) of the Act is concerned, the Designated Judge should confine himself only to the examination of the existence of an arbitration agreeme....
The judgment establishes the requirement of a written agreement for arbitration, the interpretation of settlement of disputes clauses, and the significance of party conduct in determining the existen....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.