SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Jhk) 108

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY, J.
Ramesh Kumar, S/o. Ram Bahadur & Ors. - Petitioners
Versus
The State of Jharkhand through Chief Secretary, Government of Jharkhand & Ors. - Respondents
W.P.(S) Nos. 4936, 5768 of 2023
Decided On : 15-02-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Ms. Aparajita Bhardwaj, Mr. Ashish Kumar Thakur.
For the State : Mr. Manish Mishra, GP V, Mr. Niraj Kumar Mishra, AC to GP IV.
For the JSSC : Mr. Amritanshu Singh.

IMPORTANT POINT
The court established that candidates participating in a recruitment process are bound by the communication methods specified in the advertisement, and failure to check publicly available information does not warrant relief.

Headnote:

[Writ Petition] - [Recruitment Process] - [Advertisement No. 21 of 2016, Supreme Court Orders dated 02.08.2022, 15.12.2022] - [The court discussed the legal provisions regarding communication methods in recruitment processes, emphasizing that the advertisement stipulated that all communications would be made via the official website. The court interpreted this to mean that individual notifications were not required, and the failure of the petitioners to check the website did not constitute grounds for relief. The Supreme Court's directives to complete the recruitment process within a specified timeframe further influenced the court's decision, reinforcing the necessity of adhering to the established communication protocols.]

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners filed writ petitions seeking relief related to their non-participation in the document verification process for the Trained Graduate Teacher positions under Advertisement No. 21 of 2016. They argued that they were not adequately informed about the verification dates and sought directions for reconsideration of their applications based on merit.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the recruitment process was conducted in accordance with the advertisement, which clearly stated that all communications would be made through the official website. The court held that the petitioners had sufficient opportunity to participate in the process and that their claims of ignorance regarding the verification dates were unfounded.

Issues: Whether the Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission (JSSC) adequately communicated the document verification process to the petitioners and whether the petitioners were entitled to relief based on their claims of non-communication.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the stipulations in the advertisement regarding communication methods were binding, and the petitioners could not claim ignorance of the verification process when it was publicly available on the JSSC website. The court emphasized that the Supreme Court's orders necessitated timely completion of the recruitment process, which justified the method of communication used by JSSC.

Final Decision: Both writ petitions were dismissed, with the court concluding that the petitioners were not entitled to the relief sought due to their failure to comply with the communication protocols established in the advertisement.

JUDGMENT :

Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.

Learned counsels for the parties are present.

2. W.P.(S) No.4936 of 2023 has been filed for the following reliefs :

    “1. That in the instant writ application the petitioners pray for issuance of appropriate writ(s)/ order(s)/ direction(s) as may appear just and proper for doing conscionable justice to the petitioners for the following reliefs:

(a) For direction upon the respondents to provide adequate opportunity to the petitioners to present their documents for verification before respondent Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission (hereinafter referred as "JSSC") and forthwith subject to fulfilment of requisite eligibility by the petitioners consider & recommend the candidature of the petitioners for being appointed as Trained Graduate Teacher on account of being successful in the Combined Graduate Trained Teachers Competitive Examination 2016 i.e. CGTTCE-2016 conducted by the Respondent-JSSC, as the petitioners possess requisite qualifications (Annexure-2 Series) pursuant to the Advertisement No. 21/2016 (Annexure-1).

(b) To hold that mere publishing list of roll numbers of shortlisted candidates on website (Annexure-4 Series) cannot be considered as proper communication or providing sufficient notice and opportunity to the Petitioners, particularly when all other communications between the petitioners and respondent-JSSC were held via emails, and after seeking response from the respondent-JSSC be pleased to pass appropriate orders and directions commanding upon them to appoint the Petitioners considering the fact that they are better in merit and are also fulfilling the other conditions and qualifications for the post.

(c) For direction upon the respondents to issue merit list in light of the Hon'ble Supreme Court order dated 02.08.2022 passed in Satyajit Kumar & Ors. reported in 2022 SCC Online SC 954 to publish merit list in each subject against the respective categories with respect to entire state more particularly considering the fact that there are already vacant posts of teachers in the State and the same shall be adjusted accordingly on the basis of individual merit of the candidates.

AND/OR

(d) For issuance of an appropriate writ(s)/order(s)/direction(s), particularly a Writ in the nature of mandamus commanding upon the Respondents to immediately and forthwith consider.”

3. W.P.(S) No.5768 of 2023 has been filed for the following relief :

    “(1) For issuance of an appropriate writ(s)/ order(s)/ direction(s) commanding upon the respondents to allow the petitioner to appear and submit the required certificates in terms of the letter dated 02.04.2019, issued by the Office of Controller of Examination, Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission, whereby and whereunder, the last date for submitting the aforesaid documents has been mentioned as 09.04.2019, as the same was never communicated to the petitioner by any letter or post or by an e-mail or by making a phone call;

And/Or,

(ii) For further issuance of an writ(s)/ order(s)/ direction(s) appropriate as Your Lordships may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice.”

4. These two writ petitions arise out of the same recruitment process i.e. Advertisement No.21 of 2016 and, therefore, they have been tagged together. The terms and conditions of the advertisement have been annexed in W.P.(S) No.4936 of 2023 and a counter affidavit has also been filed in the said case but neither the terms and conditions of the advertisement are available in the records of W.P.(S) No.5768 of 2023 nor any counter affidavit has been filed but the issues are similar in nature in both the writ petitions.

5. In W.P.(S) No.4936 of 2023, the petitioners are seeking relief after the orders passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in connection with the same recruitment process as mentioned in the prayer itself by stating that no indepen

          Click Here to Read the rest of this document
          1
          2
          3
          4
          5
          6
          7
          8
          9
          10
          11
          SupremeToday Portrait Ad
          supreme today icon
          logo-black

          An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

          Please visit our Training & Support
          Center or Contact Us for assistance

          qr

          Scan Me!

          India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

          For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

          whatsapp-icon Back to top