IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY, J.
Ramesh Kumar, S/o. Ram Bahadur & Ors. - Petitioners
Versus
The State of Jharkhand through Chief Secretary, Government of Jharkhand & Ors. - Respondents
W.P.(S) Nos. 4936, 5768 of 2023
Decided On : 15-02-2024
[Writ Petition] - [Recruitment Process] - [Advertisement No. 21 of 2016, Supreme Court Orders dated 02.08.2022, 15.12.2022] - [The court discussed the legal provisions regarding communication methods in recruitment processes, emphasizing that the advertisement stipulated that all communications would be made via the official website. The court interpreted this to mean that individual notifications were not required, and the failure of the petitioners to check the website did not constitute grounds for relief. The Supreme Court's directives to complete the recruitment process within a specified timeframe further influenced the court's decision, reinforcing the necessity of adhering to the established communication protocols.]
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners filed writ petitions seeking relief related to their non-participation in the document verification process for the Trained Graduate Teacher positions under Advertisement No. 21 of 2016. They argued that they were not adequately informed about the verification dates and sought directions for reconsideration of their applications based on merit.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the recruitment process was conducted in accordance with the advertisement, which clearly stated that all communications would be made through the official website. The court held that the petitioners had sufficient opportunity to participate in the process and that their claims of ignorance regarding the verification dates were unfounded.
Issues: Whether the Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission (JSSC) adequately communicated the document verification process to the petitioners and whether the petitioners were entitled to relief based on their claims of non-communication.
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the stipulations in the advertisement regarding communication methods were binding, and the petitioners could not claim ignorance of the verification process when it was publicly available on the JSSC website. The court emphasized that the Supreme Court's orders necessitated timely completion of the recruitment process, which justified the method of communication used by JSSC.
Final Decision: Both writ petitions were dismissed, with the court concluding that the petitioners were not entitled to the relief sought due to their failure to comply with the communication protocols established in the advertisement.
JUDGMENT :
Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.
Learned counsels for the parties are present.
2. W.P.(S) No.4936 of 2023 has been filed for the following reliefs :
(a) For direction upon the respondents to provide adequate opportunity to the petitioners to present their documents for verification before respondent Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission (hereinafter referred as "JSSC") and forthwith subject to fulfilment of requisite eligibility by the petitioners consider & recommend the candidature of the petitioners for being appointed as Trained Graduate Teacher on account of being successful in the Combined Graduate Trained Teachers Competitive Examination 2016 i.e. CGTTCE-2016 conducted by the Respondent-JSSC, as the petitioners possess requisite qualifications (Annexure-2 Series) pursuant to the Advertisement No. 21/2016 (Annexure-1).
(b) To hold that mere publishing list of roll numbers of shortlisted candidates on website (Annexure-4 Series) cannot be considered as proper communication or providing sufficient notice and opportunity to the Petitioners, particularly when all other communications between the petitioners and respondent-JSSC were held via emails, and after seeking response from the respondent-JSSC be pleased to pass appropriate orders and directions commanding upon them to appoint the Petitioners considering the fact that they are better in merit and are also fulfilling the other conditions and qualifications for the post.
(c) For direction upon the respondents to issue merit list in light of the Hon'ble Supreme Court order dated 02.08.2022 passed in Satyajit Kumar & Ors. reported in 2022 SCC Online SC 954 to publish merit list in each subject against the respective categories with respect to entire state more particularly considering the fact that there are already vacant posts of teachers in the State and the same shall be adjusted accordingly on the basis of individual merit of the candidates.
AND/OR
(d) For issuance of an appropriate writ(s)/order(s)/direction(s), particularly a Writ in the nature of mandamus commanding upon the Respondents to immediately and forthwith consider.”
3. W.P.(S) No.5768 of 2023 has been filed for the following relief :
And/Or,
(ii) For further issuance of an writ(s)/ order(s)/ direction(s) appropriate as Your Lordships may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice.”
4. These two writ petitions arise out of the same recruitment process i.e. Advertisement No.21 of 2016 and, therefore, they have been tagged together. The terms and conditions of the advertisement have been annexed in W.P.(S) No.4936 of 2023 and a counter affidavit has also been filed in the said case but neither the terms and conditions of the advertisement are available in the records of W.P.(S) No.5768 of 2023 nor any counter affidavit has been filed but the issues are similar in nature in both the writ petitions.
5. In W.P.(S) No.4936 of 2023, the petitioners are seeking relief after the orders passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in connection with the same recruitment process as mentioned in the prayer itself by stating that no indepen
The court established that candidates participating in a recruitment process are bound by the communication methods specified in the advertisement, and failure to check publicly available information....
The court ruled that candidates must adhere to the selection process terms, and failure to appear for document verification despite multiple opportunities negates any claim for relief.
Appellants lacked a legal right to personal notification for document verification as per advertisement norms; negligence in following the stipulated communication method led to dismissal of their cl....
The recruiting agency must ensure proper communication with selected candidates regarding verification and appointment processes to uphold their rights.
The main legal point established is the requirement to adhere to principles of natural justice, including informing the reasons for rejection and providing the opportunity to rectify defects, in admi....
Candidates on a merit list do not have an indefeasible right to appointment if they fail to meet the prescribed cut-off marks, emphasizing the need for fair recruitment processes.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.