SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Jhk) 1103

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
M. S. Ramachandra Rao, C.J., Deepak Roshan
Nirmal Pahan – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand through its Secretary/Principal Secretary, School Education and Literacy Department – Respondent


Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :M/s. Manoj Tandon, Neha Bhardwaj, Saurabh, Shekhar, Shubham Mishra, Ashutosh Anand No. 2, Harsh Chandra, Amritansh Vats, P.A.S. Pati, Rohan Kashyap, Akash Deep, Advocates
For the Respondent:M/s Gaurav Raj (AC to AAG-II), J. F. Toppo (GA-V), Neil Abhijit Toppo (AC to GA-V), Md. Shahabuddin (SC-VII), Suraj Prakash (AC to SC-VII), Manish Kumar (Sr. SC-II), Ashwini Bhushan (AC to Sr. S.C.-II), Rohit, (AC to AAG-I), Aditya Kumar (AC to Sr. SCI), Sahbaj Akhtar, AC to AAG.-III), Rakesh Ranjan (AC to GA-I), Mr. Rajiv Ranjan, A.G, M/s. Sanjoy Piprawall, Rakesh Ranjan, Prince Kumar, Jay Prakash, Tejo Mistri, Pravin Kumar Pandey, Amit Kumar, Richa Sanchita, Pinky Shaw, Dr. Ashok Kr. Singh, Sharon Toppo, Advocates

Table of Content
1. unconstitutionality of district-post reservation (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. appellants' grievances over document verification notice (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 12)
3. claim of inadequate communication leads to candidates missing opportunities. (Para 10 , 11)
4. defendant's rebuttal on communication faults (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
5. the commission's advertised rules regarding information are binding. (Para 18 , 19)
6. court's analysis on advertisement terms (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25)
7. court's reluctance to grant sympathy (Para 26 , 27 , 28)
8. absence of legal entitlement for individual communication (Para 30 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36)
9. courts cannot compel actions not explicitly outlined by statutes. (Para 31)
10. dismissal of letters patent appeals (Para 37 , 38)

JUDGMENT :

M.S. Ramachandra Rao, C.J.

1. Since common issue is raised in all these LPAs, they are being disposed of by this common judgment. For reference we shall refer to the facts in W.P.(S). No. 3436 of 2023.

2. The appellants were all issued Admit Cards and they had appeared for the Combined Graduate Trained Teacher Competitive Examination - 2016 held on various dates between 29.10.2017 and 2.12.20

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top