Back
GANESH RAM MEENA
Altaf Son Of Abdul Aziz – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Medical And Health – Respondent
ORDER :
Ganesh Ram Meena, J.
1. By filing instant writ petition the petitioner has prayed to issue directions to the respondents to allow him joining on the post of Nurse Gr.II in pursuance of the select list dated 09.02.2016 as per his merit with all consequential benefits.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not been issued the appointment order and also not allowed him the joining on the post of Nurse Gr.II even after his final selection pursuant to the advertisement dated 26.02.2013. Counsel submits that the respondents issued the revised list of selected candidates on 09.02.2016 (Annex.4) wherein the name of the petitioner was placed at S.No. 7016. However, the respondents neither issued any appointment order in favour of the petitioner even after he being placed in the select list nor the respondents informed about the select list because of which he has been deprived from appointment on the post of Nurse Gr.II.
3. Counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the petitioner was though placed in the select list dated 09.02.2016 but he did not appear for verification of documents on the given date and, therefore, no appointment order was issu
Appellants lacked a legal right to personal notification for document verification as per advertisement norms; negligence in following the stipulated communication method led to dismissal of their cl....
The court ruled that candidates must adhere to the selection process terms, and failure to appear for document verification despite multiple opportunities negates any claim for relief.
The court established that candidates participating in a recruitment process are bound by the communication methods specified in the advertisement, and failure to check publicly available information....
Unsuccessful selection candidates estopped from challenging process; public institutions must declare all selection outcomes transparently before re-advertising to prevent suspicion.
The main legal point established is that there was no absolute obligation on the respondent to communicate through both email and phone number, and fair opportunities were given to the petitioner for....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
