IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, J.
Sanjit Kumar @ Sanjeet Kumar S/o Bhamar Pal - Appellant
Versus
Directorate of Enforcement through Assistant Director (Complainant) - Respondent
B.A. No. 7501 of 2024
Decided On : 21-03-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of bail application and allegations (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments for the petitioner’s innocence (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. arguments for and against the bail application. (Para 5 , 9 , 10 , 19) |
| 4. arguments against granting bail (Para 6 , 7) |
| 5. court's observations on the evidence and legal standards. (Para 8 , 16 , 29 , 36) |
| 6. implications and necessity for compliance with pmla (Para 25 , 28 , 39 , 41) |
| 7. court’s legal reasoning in declining the bail application. (Para 38 , 46 , 50 , 60) |
| 8. definition and scope of money laundering under pmla (Para 45 , 47 , 58 , 59) |
| 9. final decision on bail application (Para 90 , 93) |
| 10. final conclusion on the application for bail. (Para 94) |
JUDGMENT :
SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, J.
Prayer:
1. The instant application has been filed under Section 4 83 and 484 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 praying for grant of bail in connection with ECIR Case No.06 of 2023, arising out of ECIR/RNZO/25/2023 registered under Section 3 punishable under Section 4 of Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (herein referred as Act2002).
Factual Matrix of the Case:
2. The prosecution story in brief as per the allegation made in the instant ECIR/complaint reads as under:
The petitioner was involved in preparation of fake deeds, falsification of government records and tampering with revenue registers to acquire and dispose of landed properties as a member of syndicate which comprises of Md. Saddam Hussain, Afshar Ali, Bhanu Pratap Prasad and others. The said accused person also involved in preparation of fake deeds for acquiring properties admeasuring 4.83 acres at Cheshire Home Road, Ranchi. As per the present circle rates of the urban residential properties, the value of the land admeasuring 483 decimals stands at Rs.22.69 crores @ Rs.4,68,291/- per decimal. The petitioner along with Tapas Ghosh who was directly a party with the accused persons namely, Afshar Ali, Md. Saddam Hussain, Priya Ranjan Sahay and others have assisted them in their activities related acquisition, possession and use to of proceeds of crime and projected the said illegally acquired lands as untainted properties.
During further investigation, the role of the three persons namely, Md. Irshad, Sanjit Kumar (petitioner) and Tapas Ghosh emerged in the forgery in relation to the above stated properties. Tapas Ghosh worked as a deed searcher at the Registrar of Assurances, Kolkata and petitioner Sanjit Kumar worked as a Sweeper/Watchman at Registrar of Assurances, Kolkata on contractual basis. The accused Tapas Ghosh and Sanjeet Kumar were involved in supplying blank pages and original volumes from the Registrar Assurances, Kolkata. They were in direct contact with accused Irshad Akhtar and provided original registers for making fake deed. An amount of Rs.21,43,000/ has been identified to be credited in the bank account of Tapas Ghosh by way of Bank Transfers or cash deposits in lieu of providing assistance to the accused persons of the stated Syndicate.
Further proceeds of crime have also been identified in the bank account of petitioner, Sanjeet Kumar, an amount of Rs. 60,000/- has been identified in his bank account which have been deposited by the accused persons of the land grabbing Syndicate and also some amounts were transferred in Bank account of Irshad who used to prepare fake deed of landed property.
The present petitioner had been arrested and accordingly the petitioner had preferred the Misc. Cri. Application No.1858 of 2024 for grant of his bail but the same was dismissed vide order dated 15.07.2024 passed by the learned Additional Judicial Commissioner-I-cum-Spl. Judge, PML Act, Ranchi.
Hence the present petition has been preferred for the grant of bail.
Argument on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner:
3. Mr. R.S. Mazumdar, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has taken the following grounds:
i. The petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case as he has committed no offenc
Pavana Dibbur vs. Directorate of Enforcement
Tarun Kumar vs. Assistant Director Directorate of Enforcement
Rohit Tandon v. Directorate of Enforcement
Virupakshappa Gouda v. State of Karnataka
P. Chidambaram v. Central Bureau Investigation
Ramesh Bhavan Rathod vs. Vishanbhai Hirabhai Makwana
Siddhrajsinh Bhagubha Vaghela v. State of Gujarat
The court established that under the PMLA, an accused can be convicted for money laundering even if not formally accused in the predicate offense, emphasizing the independent and serious nature of ec....
The offence of money laundering under the PMLA is independent, and involvement in proceeds of crime suffices for liability; stringent conditions for bail must be met.
The offence of money laundering under PMLA is independent of underlying scheduled offences; involvement in any process related to proceeds of crime suffices for liability under Section 3.
The court emphasized that in money laundering cases, the burden is on the accused to prove absence of mens rea, and economic crimes warrant stricter scrutiny in bail considerations.
The court emphasized that under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, bail can only be granted if there are reasonable grounds to believe the accused is not guilty, which was not established in thi....
The conditions for granting bail under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act are mandatory, requiring the court to be satisfied of the accused's non-guilt and lack of likelihood to commit further of....
(1) Economic offences having deep-rooted conspiracies and involving huge loss of public funds need to be viewed seriously and considered as grave offences affecting economy of country as a whole and ....
The conditions for granting bail under Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, are mandatory, requiring the court to be satisfied that the accused is not guilty and is not likely ....
The court ruled that in economic offenses, particularly money laundering, anticipatory bail is rarely granted due to the grave nature of allegations and potential interference with investigations.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.