IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
Bhagwan Bhagat, son of Late Jagannath Bhagat – Appellant
Versus
The State of Jharkhand – Respondent
B.A. No. 10255 of 2023
Decided on : 12-04-2024
[BAIL] - [Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002] - [Sections 3, 4, 45, 50] - [The court discussed the provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, particularly focusing on the definitions of 'proceeds of crime' and the conditions for bail under Section 45. The court emphasized that the offence of money laundering is independent of the predicate offence and that the burden of proof lies with the accused to demonstrate that the proceeds are not tainted. The court also highlighted the mandatory nature of the conditions under Section 45 for granting bail, which requires the court to be satisfied that the accused is not guilty and is not likely to commit further offences while on bail.]
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought bail under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, in connection with allegations of illegal mining and money laundering involving substantial proceeds of crime. The Enforcement Directorate's investigation revealed the petitioner's close association with the prime accused, Pankaj Mishra, and substantial cash transactions linked to illegal activities.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner was deeply involved in the illegal mining operations and the laundering of proceeds of crime. The evidence presented indicated that the petitioner had knowingly assisted in these activities and had significant financial transactions linked to the proceeds of crime.
Issues: Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, considering the nature of the allegations and the statutory requirements for bail under Section 45.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the conditions for granting bail under Section 45 of the PMLA are mandatory and must be satisfied. The court emphasized that the offence of money laundering is independent of the predicate offence and that the burden of proof lies with the accused to demonstrate that the proceeds are not tainted. The court also noted that economic offences, particularly those involving money laundering, require a different approach in bail considerations due to their serious implications.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the bail application, concluding that the petitioner failed to meet the necessary conditions for bail under the PMLA and that the evidence against him was substantial enough to warrant continued detention.
JUDGMENT :
SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, J.
Prayer:
1. The instant application has been filed under Section 439 and 440 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 praying for grant of bail in connection with Case No.ECIR-04/2022(S), arising out of ECIR/RNZO/03/2022 registered under Section 3 punishable under Section 4 of PML Act, 2022.
Factual Matrix of the Case:
2. The prosecution story in brief as per the allegation made in the instant ECIR/complaint reads as under:
The case of prosecution in brief is that the investigation under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, was initiated by recording an ECIR bearing no. 3/2022 based on the FIR no. 85/2020 dt. 22.06.2020 of one Sambhu Nandan Kumar at Barharwa Police Station, Distt-Sahebganj, Jharkhand against accused Pankaj Mishra and others. It is alleged that the accused persons threatened the above complainant over the phone not to participate in the tender of Barharwa Toll, and on the refusal of which the complainant was attacked by a mob, on the behest of the accused persons. Subsequently, the charge sheet no. 231/2020 dated 30.11.2020 was filed in the court at Rajmahal, Distt-Sahebganj. Further, the agency took several other FIRs related to the matter along with the above case to investigate the instant case.
It was revealed during the investigation that the vehicles carrying the mined items (Mainly stone chips) had to cross Barharwa Toll before reaching the main roads. It was also revealed that apart from mining under valid licenses, a vast quantity of mining is being carried out illegally in Sahibganj District and adjoining areas. It also revealed that the accused person, Pankaj Mishra, is involved in the illegal collection of levies from the trucks carrying stone chips through his accomplices and also has control over the mining of stone chips and boulders as well as installation and operations of several crushers, set up across various mining sites in Sahebganj district. He has a fixed share in almost all the mines and transportation by several persons, including his associates. He enjoys political clout, being the representative of the Chief Minister, Jharkhand, who is also an MLA from Barhait, Sahebganj. The investigation into the bank accounts reveals the acquisition of proceeds of crime running into crores of rupees.
It is stated that to unearth the larger picture, the Enforcement Directorate has merged the other FIRs who were lodged against the accused Pankaj Mishra, related to illegal mining into existing ECIR. Further, the issue of illegal mining & damage to the environment is also being investigated considering the observation of the Hon’ble National Green Tribunal (NGT), New Delhi given in the matter and various FIRs registered related to the issue of illegal mining. It is further alleged that apart from mining under valid license, a huge quantity of mining is being carried out illegally in Sahibganj District and adjoining areas and the accused Pankaj Mishra is involved in illegal collection of levies from the trucks carrying stone chips through his accomplices. It is further, alleged that total cash amounting to Rs. 5,34,44,400/- was recovered from accomplices as well as close associates of the prime accused Pankaj Mishra. Further, the supplementary prosecution complaint reveals that the proceeds of crime out of the illegal mining are generated in cash and are also being transferred to the accused, Pankaj Mishra, by the accused, Tinkal Kumar Bhagat, Krishna Kumar Saha, and the present petitioner.
In the instant case, these accused persons have knowingly acquired and possessed the proceeds of crime in such a manner as if it was untainted money; they also trying to project the said ill-gotten money/proceeds of crime as untainted. Further, it has been alleged that the accused petitioner has not only received the huge amount in illegal way earned through illegal mining, trad
P. Chidambaram v. Central Bureau Investigation reported in 2020 13 SCC 337
Rohit Tandon vs. Directorate of Enforcement
Ramesh Bhavan Rathod vs. Vishanbhai Hirabhai Makwana
State of Gujarat v. Mohanlal Jitamalji Porwal [(1987) 2 SCC 364 : 1987 SCC (Cri) 364]
The court established that under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, the offence of money laundering is independent of the predicate offence, and the burden of proof lies on the accused to ....
The offence of money laundering under PMLA is independent of underlying scheduled offences; involvement in any process related to proceeds of crime suffices for liability under Section 3.
In economic offences, bail is not a right; the burden rests on the applicant to show no risk of interference with justice or likelihood of guilt, reinforced by the position of the accused.
The court established that under the PMLA, an accused can be convicted for money laundering even if not formally accused in the predicate offense, emphasizing the independent and serious nature of ec....
The court emphasized that bail under the PMLA requires satisfaction of twin conditions regarding the accused's guilt and likelihood of committing further offences, which were not met in this case.
Economic offences of huge magnitude with deep conspiracy and public fund loss require stringent bail denial, prioritizing offence gravity, prima facie evidence, tampering/fleeing risks over custody d....
The offence of money laundering under the PMLA is independent, and involvement in proceeds of crime suffices for liability; stringent conditions for bail must be met.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.