Back
SUBHASH CHAND
Vijay Prakash Sinha @ Bijay Prakash Sinha – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The instant Cr. Revision has been directed against the order dated 12.07.2023 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate-XIII, Ranchi in M.C.A. No. 7223 of 2022, corresponding to G.R.No. 952 of 2022, arising out of Argora P.S. Case No. 59 of 2021 whereby the application for discharge of the petitioner under 239 of Cr.P.C. was partly rejected.
2. The brief facts leading to this Cr. Revision are that the informant had given the written information with the Police Station concerned with these allegations that the informant are four brothers including himself. They are Sheo Prakash Sinha, Vijay Prakash Sinha, Ravi Prakash Sinha and Jay Prakash Sinha. Two brothers Sheo Prakash Sinha and Ravi Prakash Sinha reside on the ground floor and a few days back, his brother Ravi Prakash Sinha had gone to his flat. The rest of his two brothers Vijay Prakash Sinha and Jay Prakash Sinha both reside on the upper floor. On 24.02.2021 the informant was going to the lavatory. He was obstructed by Vijay Prakash Sinha to go there and began to beat him. His wife and his son both came to rescue Vijay Prakash Sinha and his son Harsh Vijay @ Rishi both had also assaulted them whereby his wife, he and
The court must evaluate F.I.R. allegations and evidence without conducting a mini trial when considering a discharge application.
The rejection of a discharge petition is justified when credible allegations of physical assault and dowry demands support the framing of charges under IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for a prima facie case for proceeding against the accused and the presence of grave suspicion against the accused in determining th....
At the stage of considering an application for discharge, the court must proceed on the assumption that the material brought on record by the prosecution is true and evaluate the material to determin....
At the stage of framing of charge, the court must prima facie consider whether there is sufficient ground for proceeding against the accused, without appreciating evidence for conviction.
The court must determine if there exists a prima facie case for framing charges without delving into the probative value of evidence at the discharge stage.
At the stage of framing of the charge, the accused has no right to produce any material, and the trial court has to apply its judicial mind to the facts of the case to determine whether a case has be....
The court established that for a charge under Section 307 IPC to be sustained, there must be clear evidence of intent to kill, which was not present in this case due to the nature of injuries and the....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
