RAM MANOHAR NARAYAN MISHRA
Rajkumar @ Raju – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Challenge in this revision is to the order dated 17.5.20223 passed by learned Special Judge (POCSO Act)/ Additional Sessions Judge, Bareilly, in Case Crime No.368 of 2019, under Sections 147, 148, 323, 504, 506, 452, 354-Ka IPC and Section 8 of POCSO Act, Police Station Aonla, District Bareilly, wheeby the discharge application moved by the accused-revisionists in said case under Section 227 Cr.P.C. has been dismissed and case was fixed for framing of charge.
2. Heard learned counsel for the revisionists, learned AGA for the State and perused the material placed on record.
3. Factual matrix of the case in brief are that the FIR was lodged at the instance of respondent No.2 at police station concerned on 27.7.2019, at 16:16 hours on the basis of order passed by learned Special Judge, POCSO Act, Bareilly on application under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. filed by the informant on 16.7.2019, with averment that on 4.9.2019, at around 6:20 AM, accused persons namely Raju, Pappi, Guddu, Darpan and Veer Singh, who are resident of her mohalla had mercilessly beaten and threatened him with life. The son and husband of the informant went somewhere else due to fear of accused persons. As
Dilawar Balu Kurane v. State of Maharashtra
Niranjan Singh Karam Singh Punjabi v. Jitendra Bhimraj Bijjaya
Onkar Nath Mishra v. State (NCT of Delhi)
Sheoraj Singh Ahlawat v. State of U.P.
State of Bihar v. Ramesh Singh
State of Orissa v. Debendra Nath Padhi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.