Back
GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Birju Mahto – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.
1. The judgment of conviction under Sections 304 Part II read with Section 149 of the IPC is under challenge in the instant criminal appeal.
2. As per the fardbeyan of Anju Devi recorded on 02.01.2002, on 01.01.2002 at about 7 a.m. when her father-in-law was giving fodder to the cattle, Kameshwar Mahto, Tiru @ Lalbihari Mahto, Birju Mahto, Parmeshwar Mahto, Gurdayal Mahto, Bhola Mahto, Sundar Mahto, Kishun Mahto, Pradeep Mahto, Dongni Devi, Pashilini Devi and Reena Devi came armed with weapons and surrounded her father-in-law and started abusing him. There was hot exchange of words and it is alleged that on incitement of Bhola Mahto to kill Sukhi Mahto, the accused persons Hiru Mahto, Lalbihari Mahto, Birju Mahto armed with Lathi, assaulted Sukhi Mahto on his head, resulting in bleeding injury as a result he fell down. On alarm being raised, Birendra Mahto came running to his rescue, who was also assaulted by Parmeshwar Mahto, Bhola Mahto and Kameshwar Mahto. The genesis of offence has been stated to be trivial dispute over collecting cow dung.
3. On the fardbeyan, Barkagaon P.S. Case 2/2002 was registered against all the 13 named accused persons u
The court emphasized the necessity of careful scrutiny of witness testimonies and the principle of benefit of doubt in criminal cases, leading to acquittals and affirmations of convictions based on e....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for the prosecution to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt, the credibility of witness testimonies, and the importance of con....
The court affirmed the conviction under Section 304(II) IPC, establishing that the accused had knowledge that their actions could likely result in death, based on the nature of injuries inflicted.
The court upheld the conviction for murder based on reliable eyewitness testimony and rejected the alibi defence due to lack of corroborative evidence.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of Exception 4 to section 300 of the Indian Penal Code in cases of sudden fights, and the need for caution in evaluating the testim....
The significance of the delay in lodging the First Information Report, the evidence of injured witnesses, and the discrepancies in the prosecution's evidence were central to the court's decision.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
