SUBHASH CHAND
Subodh Bara Babu @ Subodh Kumar Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Subhash Chand, J.
1. Heard learned senior counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the Opposite Party No. 2.
2. The instant criminal revision is against the order dated 28th June, 2022 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Sahebganj in M.C.A. No. 45 of 2020, arising out of S.T. Case No. 10 of 2020, whereby the petition for discharge filed on behalf of the petitioner had been dismissed.
3. Mr. B.M. Tirpathy, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that the impugned order passed by the learned court below is erroneous in the eyes of law as well as on facts. The learned trial court did not consider the allegations made against the petitioner which were far from truth. The police after concluding the investigation had filed the Final Report against which the informant filed protest-cum-complaint petition on 28th September, 2010 and the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sahebganj took cognizance against the petitioner under Section 376 of the I.P.C. It is further submitted that against the order taking cognizance dated 18th October, 2018, the petitioner preferred a criminal miscellaneous petiti
CBI v. Mukesh Pravinchandra Shroff
D. Devraja v. Owais Sabeer Hussain
Kailash Vijayvargiya v. Rajlakshmi Chaudhuri
Palwinder Singh v. Balwinder Singh
Point of Law : Alleged indulgence of the officers in cheating, fabrication of records or misappropriation cannot be said to be in discharge of their official duty - Their official duty is not to fabr....
Prior sanction under Section 197 Cr.P.C. is mandatory to prosecute public servants for actions within their official duties, protecting them from vexatious allegations.
The rejection of the B-Summary Report was upheld due to prima facie evidence against police officers for assaulting and humiliating an informant, affirming the magistrate's duty to assess evidence th....
The requirement of prior sanction under Section 197 of the CrPC is crucial for prosecuting public servants for acts done in the discharge of their official duties, to protect them from malicious and ....
Sanction under Section 197 of the Cr.P.C. is mandatory for prosecuting public servants for actions taken while performing official duties, preventing misuse of legal proceedings.
Protection under Section 197 Cr.PC is essential for public servants to prevent frivolous prosecutions arising from actions taken in the course of official duties.
The protection under Section 197 Cr.P.C. is not available to public servants who commit offenses that are not connected with the discharge of their official duties or who act in excess of their autho....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.