IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Deepak Roshan, J.
Maithon Power Limited - Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand, through the Chief Secretary and ors. – Respondents
W.P. (C) No. 6362 of 2023
Decided On : 03-12-2024
JUDGMENT :
Deepak Roshan, J.
Petitioner has filed the instant writ petition praying therein for the following reliefs:-
(ii) For issuance of further appropriate writ/order/direction, including Writ of Declaration declaring that the activity of generation of electricity undertaken by the Petitioner-Maithon Power Limited falls within the category of ‘Essential Services’ and, thus, it is the responsibility of the Respondent-State of Jharkhand, including its officials to ensure that no hindrance is created in carrying out the aforesaid ‘Essential Services’ of generation of electricity, more particularly, preventing from laying of dead-bodies of workmen and consequently staging of protests/dharnas in front of the Factory Gate of the Petitioner-company.
2. Brief facts of the case as per the pleadings are that Petitioner is a Joint Venture entity of Tata Power Company Ltd. and Damodar Valley Corporation Ltd. having shares of 74:26 per cent respectively and has already set-up a Power Station/Power Plant at Maithon in the District of Dhanbadhaving capacity of 1050 M.W. which started commercial production in the year 2011.
3. For the purpose of setting up the Power Plant, approximately 564 acres of land was acquired in favour of Damodar Valley Corporation Ltd. under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and Petitioner formulated a Rehabilitation and Resettlement Scheme, wherein it agreed to provide regular employment opportunity to all land losers or home losers or their dependents through Contract Labour entity working under the Petitioner.
It was further provided, inter alia, that in lieu of such employment, one time compensation was to be paid to Project affected persons, and, it is the case of the Petitioner that at present about 250 employees are working in direct role of the Petitioner and about 2500 employees including around 800 Project affected persons are working through the Contract Labour entity employed by Petitioner in terms of the Contract Labour (Prohibition and Abolition) Act, 1870.
4. The further case of the Petitioner is that since establishment of its Generating Plant, it is facing continuous hindrances in running its Plant especially under the circumstances, when one or the other employees working under the Petitioner or its Contractor die during subsistence of employment period.
The further case of the Petitioner is that there are approximately 2500 employees working in Petitioner’s Plant and due to natural phenomena of illness, employees succumb to death during subsistence of their employment and such deaths are natural deaths and not due to accident death caused during the course of employment. However, despite the fact that death of one or the other employees occurs due to natural phenomena as a natural death, Petitioner is continuously facing immense problem when such death occurs, in asmuchas, dead-body of the deceased employee is brought and kept at Main Gate/ Factory Gate of the Petitioner thereby hindering the entire activities of ingress and outgress of the Petitioner’s Power Plant which has massive restriction upon the people working in Power Plant of Petitioner including movement of raw materials, and, essential activity pertaining to generation of electricity comes to a complete stand-still during such protests.
5. Petitioner, by way of example, has stated instances pertaining to death of one Bijay Kisku, a 39-years old Project Affected Person (PAP), who died on 29th August, 2023 after suffering from illness, as a nat
The right to live with dignity under Article 21 includes the right to a decent burial or cremation, obligating the State to prevent the use of dead bodies for protests.
(1) Disinterment of body of slain militant for the purpose of religious rituals – After a body has been buried, it is considered to be in custody of law – Disinterment is not a matter of right – Dist....
The court affirmed the right to burial in accordance with religious customs, emphasizing the need for designated burial grounds for minority communities to prevent discrimination.
The right to life guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India includes the right to dignity and respect, which extends to a person's dead body.
Involving disposal of dead bodies of Covid-19 victims after giving due consideration to various decisions of Hon-ble Supreme Court as well as other High Courts recognized the fundamental right of any....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the principle of strict liability, holding the respondents absolutely liable to compensate for the death caused by their negligence in maintaining ....
The liability of the respondents under the Electricity Act for negligence in maintaining electric wires and the entitlement of the petitioners to compensation.
Point of Law : Once an unnatural death is reported, it is the duty of the State machinery to complete the inquest and postmortem within a time frame and the body should be released to the bereaved fa....
Recovery of loss cannot be imposed without formal charges and an opportunity for explanation. Departmental enquiry cannot be initiated against a dead employee.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.