Back
S. N. PATHAK
Prishila Soren, D/o. Bisha Soren – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand, through the Chief Secretary, Government of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(S.N. Pathak, J.)
Heard the parties.
2. The issues involved in all these accompanied writ petitions are same, similar and identical and as such they have been tagged and heard together and common orders are being passed.
3. Petitioners in W.P.(S) No. 1435 of 2022 have prayed for the
The court emphasized the need for regular appointments over ad-hoc arrangements in educational institutions to ensure quality education and compliance with established norms.
The State Government had the power to issue directions for the appointment of a selection committee for recruitment of staff members, and the University was bound to comply with such directions. The ....
Since there are no sanctioned posts on which any of these petitioners were appointed as irregular appointments, no such directions are warranted.
An appointment as Assistant Professor must comply with statutory provisions, and agreements cannot override such laws, rendering non-compliant appointments void.
The court established that the State has the authority to set educational qualifications for teachers and that the writ court cannot alter policy decisions unless they are found to be arbitrary or un....
A sanctioned post permits appointment without prior government approval; rejection of appointment was deemed arbitrary.
Appointments against sanctioned posts do not require prior approval from the State Government, allowing for post facto validation and regularization of service.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
