Abhay Kumar Mishra vs State Of Jharkhand

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Jhk) 66

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J
Abhay Kumar Mishra – Appellant
Versus
State Of Jharkhand – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Ajit Kumar, Sr. Adv., Mr. Krishna Prajapati , Adv., Mrs. Akritishree, Adv., Mr. Anshuman Mishra , Adv.
For the Respondent: Ms. Priya Shrestha, Spl. PP., Mr. Ashutosh Anand, AAG III., Mr. Binit Chandra, AC to AAG III : Mr. Mahesh Tewari

JUDGMENT :

ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.

I.A. No. 2512 of 2025 ( in CrMP No. 1990 of 2021)

Heard the parties.

2. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that this interlocutory application has been filed with the prayer to add the Inspector General of Police, Crime Investigation Department, Jharkhand, as the opp. party no. 5, though it has been erroneously mentioned in the interlocutory application that the Inspector General of Police, Crime Investigation Department, Jharkhand, may be impleaded as party respondent no. 4. It is next submitted that this writ petition has been filed with a prayer for quashing the FIR on the ground that the FIR is misuse of provisions of Code of Criminal Procedure. It is next submitted that the FIR has been filed by the informant, in person, in a representative capacity for his clients on the basis of the documents supplied by him which is an act of fomenting litigation. It is further submitted by learned senior counsel for the petitioner that several false cases have been lodged against the present writ petitioner and another false case having been filed vide Jagarnathpur P.S. case no. 191 of 2020. The writ petitioner also filed W.P. (Cr.) no. 278 of