Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J
Arjun Ram S/o Late Saryu Bhuiyan – Appellant
Versus
State Of Jharkhand Through Home Secretary Jharkhand, – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.
I.A. No.11044 of 2023
Heard the parties.
Learned counsel for the petitioner does not press this interlocutory application.
Accordingly, this Interlocutory Application is rejected as not pressed.
W.P.Cr. No.306 of 2023
Heard the parties.
2. This Writ Petition (Cr.) under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed with a prayer for issuance of an appropriate writ (s)/order (s)/direction (s) for investigation of Tandwa P.S. Case No. 293 of 2022 properly, fairly, impartially and rapidly by the concerned police station.
3. The brief facts of the case is that the writ petitioner- who is the informant of Tandwa P.S. Case No.293 of 2022 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323/504/506 of Indian Penal Code and under Section 3(i)(c), 3(i)(e), 3(i)(w), 3(1)I, 3(1)(z) of SC/ST (POA) Act 1989; upon the complaint of the informant being (SC/ST) Complaint Case no.40 of 2022, being referred to police under Section 156(3) of Cr.P.C., and investigation of the case is going on.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that before filing the complaint case, the informant approached the police on 19.11.2022 but police were not inclined to regi
The State is obligated to conduct a fair and timely investigation into criminal cases under Article 226 of the Constitution.
The court can direct law enforcement to complete investigations within a specified time frame to ensure justice and proper legal process.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
