Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.
Paramhansh Singh son of Late Bindeshwar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. evaluation of allegations and context of the case. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. opposition to the grant of bail and necessity of prior appearance. (Para 4) |
| 3. criteria for granting anticipatory bail. (Para 5) |
JUDGMENT :
ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.
Heard the parties.
2. Apprehending their arrest, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Keredari P.S. Case No. 126 of 2022 registered under Sections 379 , 406, 447, 506, 34 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE .
3. Learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioner no. 1 being the Senior Project Manager (now retired) and the petitioner no. 2 being the Project Manager of M/s Larsen & Toubro Construction Limited, have in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons, trespassed to the premises of the informant, committed theft of his machineries by breaking open the lock of the storage and committed criminal breach of trust. It is then submitted that the allegations against the petitioners are all false and those allegations are general and omnibus in nature. It is further submitted by the learned senior c
The court granted anticipatory bail to project managers accused of theft and breach of trust, determining that the allegations were unsubstantiated and emphasizing cooperation with the investigation.
Anticipatory bail can be granted based on the nature of allegations, non-serious injuries, and promises to cooperate with the investigation, particularly where co-accused were similarly given bail.
A petitioner must be granted anticipatory bail if allegations lack credible evidence, particularly when they have no direct involvement in the matter in question and undertake cooperation with the in....
The court found no grounds for anticipatory bail due to the gravity of the offences and necessity for custodial interrogation since the case property is unrecovered.
Anticipatory bail denied to petitioner No.1 due to serious allegations; granted to petitioner No.2 based on lack of involvement and age considerations.
Anticipatory bail can be granted when allegations are deemed false and the accused demonstrate willingness to cooperate with the investigation.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
