SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Jhk) 921

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
NAVNEET KUMAR, J.
M/s. Bharat Coking Coal Limited - Appellant 
Versus
The State of Jharkhand - Respondent  
W.P. (C) No. 263 of 2006
Decided on : 14-01-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Anoop Kr. Mehta, Advocate, Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocate,  Mr. Pratyush, Advocate
For the Respondents: Mr. Ankit Kumar, AC to GP-VI

The court affirmed that mining rights vested under the Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act cannot be arbitrarily interfered with without due inquiry as mandated by law.

Headnote:

(A) Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1973 - Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950 - Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Writ petition under Article 226 for restraining respondents from interfering with coal mining activities on specified plots claimed to be vested in petitioner since nationalization - Respondents' verbal order to halt operations deemed illegal due to failure to conduct necessary inquiries as mandated by Section 29(3) of the Forest Act. (Paras 1, 117, 119)

(B) Right to conduct mining operations - The petitioner holds valid rights over the land as per historical leases and nationalization provisions, and the respondents cannot arbitrarily impede operations without due process. (Paras 26, 118)

(C) The State's notification regarding protected forest status was found to lack the requisite inquiry, thus failing to extinguish existing rights. (Paras 29, 111)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, a coal mining company, claimed rights over two plots of land based on historical leases and nationalization provisions. The respondents attempted to halt operations, citing forest land concerns without proper notification and inquiry.

Findings of Court:
The court found the respondents' actions to be arbitrary and not in compliance with legal requirements, thus allowing the petitioner's operations to continue.

Issues: The main issues included the applicability of the Bihar Land Reforms Act and the legitimacy of the respondents' actions in halting mining operations.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the respondents' failure to conduct an inquiry as required by law rendered their restraining order invalid, affirming the petitioner's right to mine.

Result: Writ petition allowed.

JUDGMENT :

Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.

Prayer:

1. The instant writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed for the following reliefs:

(i) For issuance of an appropriate writ/order/direction upon the Respondents, specially the Respondents No.2 and 3 for restraining them from interfering in any manner with the coal mining activities being carried out by the petitioner on Plot Nos. 2420 and 2712 of Khata No.118 of Mouza-Bowakalan @ Barki Bowa in the district of Dhanbad which stood vested in the petitioner company on coming into force of the Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1973 with effect from 1/5/1973,

AND

(ii). For issuance of further writ/order/direction upon the Respondents restraining them from creating any disturbance in the on-going mining work of East Busseriya colliery on the plea that the coal mining activities are being carried on over forest lands.

Brief facts of the case:

2. The petitioner is holder of coal mining lease and engaged in coal mining activities. Further the East Busseriya colliery is situated at Mouza-Bowakalan @ Barki Bowa in the district of Dhanbad.

3. It has been stated that Plot No.2420 of Khata No. 118 has been recorded as Gair Abad Malik land in the Cadestral Survey Record of Rights. The said lands have been classified as Puratan Patit lands and the total area of the said Plot is 17.66 acres. Similarly, Plot No.2712 of Khata No.118 is also recorded as Gair Abad Malik land and the total area is 17.81acres. Accordingly, the total area falling under two these plots is 35.47 acres.

4. The aforesaid lands being Plot No.2420 and 2712 stands recorded under Khewat No.2 held by Rani Subhadra Kumari, the superior landlord.

5. The superior landlord, Rani Subhadra Kumari by a permanent lease being Mokrari Patta Deed No.2535 dated 10/11/1924 granted permanent lease for surface right as well as Zamindari (Intermediary) right i.e. right to collect rent also for a period of 999 years in respect of 881 Bighas in favour of one Prabhulal Pranjivan, the Ex-colliery owner.

6. In the year 1933, Raja Shiva Prasad Singh of Jharia Raj Estate who is the successor/legal heir of the said Rani Subhadra Kumari Devi, by a registered Deed No.3736 dated 14/11/1933 granted coal mining right/lease for a period of 999 years in respect of 1050 Bighas of coal land in favour of Maya Shanker Bhagwanji, son of Bhagwanji and Jatashanker Dossa.

7. Amongst the lessees of Deed No.2535 dated 10/11/1924 and Deed No. 3736 dated 14/11/1933, a partition of the said 1050 Bighas of land was carried out vide registered Partition Deed No.3970 dated 23/9/1937. As per the said Deed, 300 Bighas out of the said 1050 Bighas of land was allotted to one Mukta Bait, wife of late Maya Shanker Bhagwanji and Prabhulal Pranjivan son of Prajjivan Harishanker and remining 750 Bighas were allotted to Jatashankar Dossa, son of Late Dossa and others.

8. By virtue of subsequent partition through various partition deeds as well as sale Deeds executed in favour of Jatashanker Dossa, he became the absolute owner in respect of 750 Bighas of coal land inclusive of related surface lands.

9. The said Jatashanker Dossa vide registered Indenture Deed No. 9053 dated 13/9/1943 sold and transferred the said 750 Bighas land covered by Deed of the year 1924 and Deed of the year 1933 in favour of East Busseriya Colliery Company Limited. The said East Busseriya colliery Company Limited carried out coal mining business in the said 750 Bighas of land inclusive of lands falling under Plot No.2420 and 2712 referred to hereinabove.

10. The aforesaid coal mining operations included extraction of coal from underground coal mines and establishing Dhowras/staff quarters, Magazine house, inclines and other infrastructures etc.

11. On coming into force of the Bihar Land Reforsms Act, 1950 the Intermediary interest of the Ex-Zamindari vested in the State Government. However, in view of the provisions contained in Sections 9 and 10 of the said Act, the interest of mining lessee

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top