Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Syed Tarique Alam s/o – Syed Mahmood – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of the case and allegations against the petitioner. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments presented by the petitioner and references to case law. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 3. court's analysis of the elements of the offences alleged. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 4. determination of charges and abuse of process of law. (Para 25) |
| 5. final order and conclusion of the court. (Para 26 , 27 , 28) |
JUDGMENT :
ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.
1. Heard the parties.
2. Though the opposite party No.2 is appearing through the Advocate but no one turns up on behalf of the opposite party No.2 in spite of repeated calls.
3. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure with the prayer to quash the order dated 13.05.2024 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Hazaribagh in Criminal Revision No.20 of 2024 whereby and where under the learned Sessions Judge, Hazaribagh has dismissed the criminal revision which was filed challenging the order dated 04.03.2025 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Hazaribagh in connection with Katkamsan
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
