IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, ARUN KUMAR RAI
Amit Kumar Singh son of Randhir Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Ahuti Priya, daughter of Salendra Kumar Singh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, J.
Prayer:
1. The instant appeal under Section 19(1) of the Family Court Act, 1984 is directed against order/judgment dated 28.08.2023 and decree dated 16.09.2023 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Godda in Original Suit No. 137 of 2021, whereby and whereunder the learned court has allowed the suit and the marriage between the parties has been dissolved and further the appellant- husband has been directed to pay a consolidated amount of Rs. 25,00,000/- [twenty five lakh] to the respondent-wife as permanent alimony and also directed to return all the "stridhan" and belongings, gifts of the respondent-wife to her and both the parties were directed to return all the respective gifts to each other. It has further been directed that if the amount of permanent alimony is not paid within the stipulated period, the appellant-husband was directed to pay simple interest @ 9% per annum on the unpaid amount till its realization.
Brief facts of the case
2. The brief facts of the case, as per the pleading made in the original suit, needs to be referred herein, which reads as under.
3. The marriage between the parties was solemnized on 24.06.2012 as pe
Dr. N.G. Dastane vs. S. Dastana
Vijaykumar Ramchandra Bhate v. Neela Vijay Kumar Bhate
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.