Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, ARUN KUMAR RAI
Amit Kumar Singh son of Randhir Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Ahuti Priya, daughter of Salendra Kumar Singh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for divorce under family court act. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. allegations of dowry and marital abuse. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. failure to file written statement leads to consequences. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. court orders alimony and return of gifts. (Para 14 , 15) |
| 5. arguments for the husband’s appeal against the alimony. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 6. arguments supporting claim for alimony. (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 7. court’s verification of testimonies and grounds for divorce. (Para 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 39) |
| 8. definition and scope of cruelty in divorce. (Para 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 54 , 56) |
| 9. legal definition and implications of desertion. (Para 57 , 58 , 62 , 64 , 66 , 67) |
| 10. criteria for determining permanent alimony. (Para 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 78) |
| 11. conclusion and dismissal of the appeal. (Para 82 , 83) |
JUDGMENT :
SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, J.
Prayer:
1. The instant appeal under Section 19(1) of the Family Court Act, 1984 is directed against order/judgment dated 28.08.2023 and decree dated 16.09.2023 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Godda in Original Suit No. 137 of 2021, whereby and whereunder the learned cou
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
