Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
Kamlesh Kumar son of Sri Bharat Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of the case and its background. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments on maintainability and jurisdiction. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. discussion on judicial jurisdiction and authority. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. scope and discretion of revisional powers of the high court. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. principles guiding the approach to revisional jurisdiction. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 6. discussion on special circumstances for direct high court revision. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 7. the importance of first approaching the lower court. (Para 13 , 14) |
| 8. differential scopes of section 397 and section 482. (Para 15 , 16) |
| 9. limitations of invoking section 482 post-revision petition. (Para 17 , 18) |
| 10. discussion on appropriateness of revisional venue. (Para 19 , 20) |
| 11. implications of improper judicial orders. (Para 21 , 22) |
| 12. final ruling on the revision petition. (Para 23 , 24) |
JUDGMENT :
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.
Heard Mr. P.A.S. Pati along with Mr. Prabhat Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Arup Kumar Dey, learned counsel for the State.
2. This criminal revision petition has been preferred challenging the order dated 28.05.2024 passed in Miscellaneous Criminal Application No.413/2024 in connection with Bishungarh P.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
