Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Pravin Maske @ Pravin Maske, son of Sri Rajhans Maske – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the case and allegations (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. petitioners' argument regarding jurisdiction and case merits (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. court's analysis of complainant's actions and motives (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. examination of specific offences and lack of evidence (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 5. conclusion: quashing of the fir (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
By the Court:-
ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.
Heard the parties.
2. No one turns up on behalf of the opposite party No.2 in spite of repeated calls though the opposite party No.2 has put his appearance through Advocate.
3. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure with a prayer to quash the FIR and the entire criminal proceedings arising out of Sakchi P.S. Case No.118 of 2021 currently pending in the court of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamshedpur.
4. The allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioner No.1 being the Bank Manager at the time of filing of the Complaint Case No.722 of 2021, petitioner No.2 being the Assistant Branch Manager at the same point of time, the petitioner No.3 being
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
