Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, RAJESH KUMAR
Jabbar Ansari, son of Manjoor Ansari – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background and facts of the case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. trial initiation and case registration. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. arguments by counsel regarding evidence. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. court's examination of case evidence. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. witness testimonies and medical findings. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 6. corroboration of informant's accounts. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 7. testimony of the investigating officer. (Para 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 8. conclusions drawn by learned trial court. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 9. legal principles for circumstantial evidence. (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42) |
| 10. motive and its significance in prosecution. (Para 62 , 63 , 64 , 65) |
| 11. standards for conviction beyond reasonable doubt. (Para 80 , 81 , 82) |
| 12. final court decision and its implications. (Para 94 , 95 , 96 , 97) |
ORDER :
1. The instant appeal under section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure is directed against the judgment of conviction dated 07.02.1998 and the order of sentence dated 10.02.1998 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Dhanbad in Sessions Trial No. 364 of 1995 whereby and whereunder the appellant has been convicted under sections 364, 302 and 201 of the INDIAN PEN
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
