Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, SANJAY PRASAD
Akash Kumar Roy @ Akash Roy @ Monu S/o Mithilesh Kumar Roy @ Mithilesh Roy – Appellant
Versus
Union of India through NIA – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, J.
Prayer:
1. The instant appeal preferred under Section 21(4) of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 is directed against the order dated 22.09.2025 passed in Misc. Cr. Application No. 1663 of 2025 by learned Additional Judicial Commissioner-XVI-cum-Special Judge, NIA, Ranchi whereby and whereunder the prayer for bail in connection with Special (NIA) Case No. 01 of 2021, RC Case No.-01/2021/NIA/RNC arising out of Balumath P.S. Case No. 234 of 2020 registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 353, 504, 506, 307, 427, 435, 386, 387, 120B, 121A and 216 of the Indian Penal Code Section 25(1)(b), 26, 27 and 35 of the Arms Act, Section 3 & 4 of Explosive Substance Act, Section 10, 13, 16(1)(b), 20 and 23 of UA(P) Act and Section 17 of CLA Act, 1908, has been rejected.
Factual Matrix
2. The brief facts of the case, as per the prosecution version, which required to be enumerated reads hereunder as.
3. The prosecution case is that initially, the case was instituted in Balumath P.S bearing Balumath P.S case no. 234 of 2020 dated 19.12.2020 on the basis of self-statement of S.I. Rana Bhanu Pratap Singh, officer-in- charge of the said P.S. It is alleged in the FI
Bail under the U.A.P. Act requires prima facie assessment of allegations; long custody or parity with co-accused do not automatically justify release.
Under UA(P) Act Section 43D(5), bail denied if charge-sheet shows prima facie true accusations of terrorist gang involvement; custody/delay insufficient absent changed circumstances; parity only for ....
In cases under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, bail may be denied if there is prima facie evidence of serious criminal involvement linked to national security threats.
The court upheld the denial of bail under the UAP Act, emphasizing the serious nature of the charges and the prima facie evidence against the appellant.
Bail is denied in cases involving serious charges under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act due to the appellant's criminal antecedents and status as an absconder, despite claims of parity with ....
The principle of parity in bail applications allows for equality among co-accused, emphasizing the right to a speedy trial and the unjust nature of prolonged incarceration without conviction.
The court established that under the UAPA, particularly Section 43D(5), the standard for denying bail is based on whether the accusations are prima facie true, which requires a careful examination of....
Bail under UAPA is an exception; serious charges and prima facie evidence against the accused justify denial of bail.
The court upheld the denial of bail for certain accused under the UA[P] Act, emphasizing the prima facie truth of serious charges and the right to a speedy trial, balancing individual liberty against....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
