Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, SANJAY PRASAD
Akash Kumar Roy @ Akash Roy @ Monu S/o Mithilesh Kumar Roy @ Mithilesh Roy – Appellant
Versus
Union of India through NIA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the case and charges (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. arguments supporting the appellant's bail (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 3. arguments against granting bail by the nia (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 24) |
| 4. court's analysis of evidence and previous judgments (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 5. criteria for bail under uapa and conclusion (Para 44 , 45 , 72 , 83) |
| 6. court's final decision on the appeal (Para 85 , 86) |
JUDGMENT :
SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, J.
Prayer:
1. The instant appeal preferred under Section 21(4) of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 is directed against the order dated 22.09.2025 passed in Misc. Cr. Application No. 1663 of 2025 by learned Additional Judicial Commissioner-XVI-cum-Special Judge, NIA, Ranchi whereby and whereunder the prayer for bail in connection with Special (NIA) Case No. 01 of 2021, RC Case No.-01/2021/NIA/RNC arising out of Balumath P.S. Case No. 234 of 2020 registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 353, 504, 506, 307, 427, 435, 386, 387, 120B, 121A and 216 of the Indian Penal Code Section 25(1)(b), 26, 27 and 35 of the Arms Act, Section 3 & 4 of Explosive Substance Act, Section 10, 13, 16(1)(b), 20
Bail under the U.A.P. Act requires prima facie assessment of allegations; long custody or parity with co-accused do not automatically justify release.
Under UA(P) Act Section 43D(5), bail denied if charge-sheet shows prima facie true accusations of terrorist gang involvement; custody/delay insufficient absent changed circumstances; parity only for ....
In cases under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, bail may be denied if there is prima facie evidence of serious criminal involvement linked to national security threats.
The court upheld the denial of bail under the UAP Act, emphasizing the serious nature of the charges and the prima facie evidence against the appellant.
Bail is denied in cases involving serious charges under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act due to the appellant's criminal antecedents and status as an absconder, despite claims of parity with ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
