IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI
SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI, J.
Chetna Kumar W/o Prasoon Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Prasoon Kumar S/o Birendra Kumar Narayan Singh – Respondent
Cr. Revision Nos. 570, 1036 of 2023
Decided On : 02-02-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. cross-revisions challenge family court maintenance order. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. matrimonial discord forces wife's separation from husband. (Para 3) |
| 3. husband's high income warrants enhanced maintenance. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. divorce alimony paid; husband's obligations fulfilled. (Para 6) |
| 5. section 125 crpc mandates wife's dignified sustenance. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 6. husband bears daughters' costs; alimony withdrawable. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 7. maintenance order upheld; both revisions dismissed. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
JUDGMENT :
SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI, J.
Cr. Revision No.1036 of 2023
1. In this petition, the wife has approached this Court for enhancement of maintenance amount allowed by the learned Family Court, Ranchi in Original Maintenance Case No. 89 of 2015 in view of that the challenge has been made in the present petition of order dated 21.02.2023 passed in the said Original Maintenance Case whereby the learned court has directed the sole opposite party to pay the composite sum of Rs.24,000/- per month from the date of application under section 125 Cr.P.C.
Cr. Revision No.570 of 2023
2. The husband has challenged the said order for quashing of the order passed by the learned Family Court, Ranchi, in Original Maintenance Case No.89 of 2015.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the marriage between the petitioner and the opposite party was solemnized on 27.06.1985 according to Hindu rights and customs at Danapur, Patna, in presence of the relatives and friends and well wishers and the family members and that was arranged marriage and they were living happy married life. At the time of marriage, the husband has completed his MBBS degree and was doing internship and husband has also did his M.D in Medicine and the wife has completed her B.Ed after her marriage and in this way, they were living their happy married life. He next submits that after sometime the husband has qualified in Bihar Public Service Examination and has joined Government job and he took the leave and went Saudi Arabia along with the wife and stayed there for six years and at that place, the relationship between the husband and wife was not cordial and thereafter the problem started. He next submits that the cause of action has arisen in the year 2006 with the wife had to leave the house of her husband and has continued till filing of the petition and many times both have entered in hot altercation and the husband has passed degrading remarks against his wife and at one time, the husband has become so angry that he has slapped her wife and, in that situation, the wife has left the matrimonial house and she was pulling her life somehow. He then submits that after sometime, the wife has again come back to Patna to meet her family members, especially, her daughters, but the situation was completely changed and the children were brain-washed and they were reluctant to live along with their mother and she has finally come to Ranchi for residing without any help from her husband. In the months of February, 2014, the elder daughter namely, Snehi has got married and, in that ceremony, the wife was not invited to attend the marriage. Lastly, the wife has taken the matter to the Mahila Aayog, Ranchi, for maintenance against the opposite party/ husband on 07.04.2014 but the husband even did not bother to appear before the investigating officer in spite of the registered notice and thereafter the Mahila Aayog has suggested the wife to raise the matter before the appropriate forum and in that background, the wife has filed the petition under section 125 Cr.P.C in the Family Court, at Ranchi.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the husband is a renowned neuro physician at Patna having his clinic named, Bir Bharti Clinic at Saidpur Nala, near Rajendra Nagar Stadium, Patna and his monthly income is more than 3 lacs and, in this background, she has prayed, in that petition to grant maintenance of Rs.60,000/- per month to her.
5. Learned counsel for
Maintenance under Section 125 CrPC upheld post-divorce alimony; husband's duty persists for wife's dignified sustenance per marital status, based on income evidences and family needs.
The court emphasized that maintenance must reflect the financial status of both parties, ensuring the wife maintains a standard of living consistent with her marriage while considering her earning ca....
Maintenance – A well qualified spouses should not be left idle or to remain idle basing on their maintenance amount received from their husband.
The judgment emphasizes the duty to prevent destitution and vagrancy, the need for evidence to establish income, and the balancing of interests and financial capacity in determining maintenance under....
The court affirmed that a spouse's educational qualifications do not disqualify them from receiving maintenance, emphasizing the need for a fair assessment of financial needs and obligations.
The obligation of a husband to maintain his wife under Section 125 of the CrPC is a statutory duty, and the assessment of maintenance must consider the husband's income and the wife's financial needs....
The husband has a statutory duty to maintain his wife and child under Section 125 Cr.P.C., and claims of insufficient income must be substantiated with credible evidence.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.