IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, C.J. Rajesh Shankar, J.
The State of Jharkhand - Appellants
Versus
Dr. Natwa Hansdak, son of Late Pradhan Hansdal - Respondent
L.P.A. No. 222 of 2025
Decided On : 14-10-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual overview of service transfer disputes and procedural history. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. application of 'no work, no pay' and employee's duty to comply with transfer. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 3. review and reconciliation of previous judicial orders regarding transfer legality. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 4. employer fault precludes 'no work no pay' and restrictive rule commutation. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 5. final dismissal of the appeal affirming the impugned order. (Para 32 , 33) |
JUDGMENT :
Rajesh Shankar, J. :
The present appeal has been preferred against the order dated 22.10.2024 passed in W.P.(S) No. 4453 of 2024 which has been disposed of directing the writ petitioner/respondent to file a fresh representation before the respondent nos. 2 and 3 of the said case (appellant nos. 2 and 3 herein) and the appellant no. 3 - the Principal Secretary, Department of Higher & Technical Education, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi has been directed to consider the said representation and to pass order for payment of salary to the writ petitioner/respondent for the period from 01.04.2021 to 18.02.2022 (total 324 days).
2. The factual background of the case is that the respondent was initially appointed to the post of Lecturer in the year 1987. He, while working on the post of Technical Officer at Jharkhand Council On Science, Technology & Innovation (JCSTI), Ranchi, was transferred to the Government Polytechnic, Adityapur as Lecturer vide notification as contained in memo no. 352 dated 12.03.2021 and by the same notification, one Rewati Raman Upadhyay (12 years junior to the respondent) posted as Lecturer (Metallurgy) in Government Polytechnic, Dhanbad, was transferred to the Government Polytechnic, Adityapur on the same post with additional charge of the Principal of the said institution. Pursuant to the said notification, the respondent did not join the said post and he filed representation dated 15.03.2021 raising objection against his transfer order.
3. The respondent subsequently filed a writ petition being W.P.(S) No. 1509 of 2021 assailing his transfer order which was disposed of vide order dated 29.11.2021 directing the appellants to take decision on the respondent’s representation dated 15.03.2021 with respect to the order of his transfer as well as payment of salary for the period he remained absent.
4. In the light of the order dated 29.11.2021 passed in the aforesaid writ petition and considering the respondent’s representation dated 15.03.2021, his earlier transfer notification was superseded vide subsequent notification no. 185 dated 17.02.2022 and he was transferred to Rajkiya Mahila Polytechnic, Ranchi as In-charge Principal from where he superannuated on 31.01.2023.
5. Thereafter, a reasoned order as contained in memo No. 854 dated 28.08.2023 was issued under the signature of the Secretary, Department of Higher and Technical Education, Government of Jharkhand whereby it was decided that the period of absence from duty pertaining to the respondent i.e. from 01.04.2021 to 18.02.2022 (total 324 days) would be treated as extraordinary leave and he would not be paid salary for the said period on the principle of ‘No Work No Pay’.
6. Being aggrieved with the reasoned order dated 28.08.2023, the respondent filed writ petition being W.P.(S) No. 4453 of 2024 seeking direction to the appellants to make payment of salary for the said period of absence from duty with all consequential benefits. The said writ petition was disposed of vide impugned order dated 22.10.2024 directing the respondent to file fresh representation and the same was directed to be decided by the appellant no. 3 in accordance with law.
7. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that learned Single Judge has failed to appreciate that the guidelines have been issued by the State Government vide departmental resolution No. 2001 dated 13.08.2015 regulating the transfer/posting of Le
An employee prevented from working without fault retains entitlement to salary; principles of 'No Work No Pay' do not apply.
Cancellation of transfer after relieving but before joining does not entitle salary for intervening period if employee fails to report to new posting; treated as unauthorized absence and 'dies non' u....
In cases of wrongful/illegal termination or transfer, the employee is entitled to reinstatement with continuity of service and backwages. The 'no work no pay' principle does not apply in cases of ill....
Quashing transfer order does not automatically invalidate disciplinary action for unauthorised absence; employee must join despite challenge absent stay – absence period regularized as qualifying ser....
An employee's unauthorized absence from duty, despite a challenged transfer order, does not entitle them to pay and allowances.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.