MARKANDEY KATJU, D.MURUGESAN
The Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, represented by its Secretary, Chennai and another – Appellant
Versus
Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Engineers’ Association, Electricity Avenue, represented by its General Secretary, Mr. G. Balakrishnan, Chennai – Respondent
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the records.
3. The writ petition was filed by an Association of Graduate Engineers in the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board. The dispute is between the Graduate Engineers on the one hand, and the diploma holders, who were appointed as Technical Assistants and Junior Engineers Gr.II, and who can subsequently be promoted as Assistant Engineers if they acquire B.E. Degree or A.M.I.E. through part time course or correspondence studies by internal selection, on the other. It is alleged in para.2 of the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition that the directly recruited Assistant Engineers are seniors, and they were all along drawing a higher pay than the internally selected Assistant Engineers, who are their juniors, in every wage revision. However, now some of the internally selected juniors are getting more pay than the directly recruited Assistant Engineers, who are seniors, and this has happened on account of the wage revision w.e.f., 1.12.1996 providing grant of additional increments on the basis of the number o
G. B. Mahajan v. Jalgaon Municipal Council A.I.R. 1991 S.C. 1153
Federation of Railway Officers Association v. Union of India [2003] 4 S.C.C. 289
Delhi Science Forum v. Union of India A.I.R. 1996 S.C. 1356
Rameshwar Prasad v. Managing Director
Netai Bag v. State of West Bengal [2000] 8 S.C.C. 262
Sachidan and Pandey v. State of West Bengal A.I.R. 1987 S.C. 1109
Ugar Sugar Works Limited v. Delhi Administration [2001] 3 S.C.C. 635
State of Himachal Pradesh v. Padam Dev [2002] 4 S.C.C. 510
State of Rajasthan v. Lata Arun [2002] 6 S.C.C. 252
Keshvan and Bharathi v. State of Kerala A.I.R. 1973 S.C. 1461
B. R. Enterprises v. State of U. P. [1999] 9 S.C.C. 700
Rama. Muthuramalingam v. The Deputy Superintendent of Police
State of Punjab v. Ram Lubhaya [1998] 4 S.C.C. 117
Tata Cellular v. Union of India [1994] 6 S.C.C. 651
M. H. Qureshi v. State of Bihar A.I.R. 1958 S.C. 731; 1958 S.C.J. 975
Om Kumar v. Union of India [2001] 2 S.C.C. 386
Tata Cellular v. Union of India A.I.R. 1996 S.C. 11
Krishnan Kakkanth v. Government of Kerala [1997] 9 S.C.C. 495
G. P. Mahajan v. Jalgaon Municipal Council A.I.R. 1994 S.C. 988
U. P. Kattha Factories Association v. State of U. P. [1996] 2 S.C.C. 97
State of Madhya Pradesh v. Nandlal Jaiswal A.I.R. 1987 S.C. 251
Union of India v. Dinesh Engineering Corporation [2001] 8 S.C.C. 491
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.