K.K. Sasidharan, J.

.1. In these Writ Petitions, the petitioner has impugned the order of the seventh respondent dated 13. 2007 in M.A. No.12 of 2007 confirming the order of the sixth respondent dated 1. 2006 in I.A. No.504 of 2006 in T.A. No.729 of 2002 (W.P. No.15155 of 2007) and the order dated 13. 2007 in M.A. No.13 of 2007 confirming the order of the sixth respondent dated 1. 2006 in I.A. No.505 of 2006 in T.A. No.729 of 2002 (W.P. No.15156 of 2007).

.2. The factual matrix necessary for disposal of the Writ Petitions are as below:

.The first respondent herein preferred O.A. No.277 of 2000 before the Debts Recovery Tribunal-I, Chennai against the petitioner herein and respondents 2 to 4 for a decree directing them to pay a sum of Rs.1,15,81,537.77 along with subsequent interest and the said O.A. was later transferred to Debts Recovery Tribunal-II, Chennai and renumbered as O.A. No.834 of 2001. From the records, it is found that vakalat was filed on behalf of all the defendants and reply statement was also filed contesting the claim of the bank. Subsequently, when the matter was pending for filing proof affidavit by the bank, the matter was transferred to Debts Reco