SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Mad) 894

K.SUGUNA, SUNDRESH
R. Krishnamurthy – Appellant
Versus
Principal Secretary to Government Home Dep – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:T.P. Prabhakaran, Advocate for R. Krishnamurth person, P. Vijendran, M. Radhakrishnan for Babu Rangasamy, Dr. G. Krishnamurthi, S.R. Ra G. Mohana Krishnan, Prof. Ravi Varma kumar, Senior Counsel for M. Gnanasekar, N. Nithian Radhakrishnan for S. Sathia Chandran, V. Raghavachari, M. Rajasekhar, S.R. Rajagop Senthilkumar, M. Radhakrishnan for S. Sathia Chandran, R.C. Paul Kanagaraj, S. Sathia Venkatachalapathy, Senior Counsel for M. Sriram, V. Raghavachari for S. Sivakumar, Prabakar, H. Lakshmi Shankar, T. Lajapathy Roy, C.M. Arumugam, T. Sivagnanasamb Munuswamy, L. Chandrakumar for M. Gnanasekar, S. Siva Shanmugam, Ms. Lesi Sarav Swaminathan, Advocates.
For the Respondents:A. Navaneethakrishnan, Advocate General a M.C. Swamy for Government, Somayaji, Senior Counsel assisted by Tholgappian, GA fo General, High Court, Madras, N.R. Chandran, Senior Counsel for assisted by Ms. G. Nir TNPSC.

Judgment :

(Ms. Justice K.Suguna)

1. Since the issue involved in all these writ petitions is one and the same, these writ petitions a by this common order.

2.1 W.P. No.1932 of 2012 is filed for the issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to entire records relating to Home Department Notification dated 21/01/2012, Government of T calling for applications for the post of Civil Judge from the file of the first respondent and to same and consequently direct the respondent to issue a fresh Notification in connection with direct recruitment, in accordance with law.

2.2 W.P. No.2141 of 2012 is filed for the issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call pertaining to the impugned notification dated 21.1.2012 and in particularly clause 3 (A) of the issued by the 1st respondent and to quash the same and consequently direct the responden the age limit to the fresh law graduates.

2.3 W.P. No.2353 of 2012 is filed for the issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to records pertaining to the notification issued by the 1st respondent dated 21.1.2012 and to d impugned clause I (ii) (a) of educational qualification of the notification as ultra vires and uncon

2.4 W.P. No.2363 of









































































































































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top