K. Ravichandrabaabu, J

1. The Public Information Officer (Registrar (Administration)), High Court, Madras is the writ petitioner. This Writ Petition is filed challenging the order passed by the Central Information Commission, New Delhi (first respondent herein), dated 23.1.2013, whereby the first respondent has directed the petitioner to furnish the information as sought for by the second respondent herein, insofar as six appeals are concerned. In respect of other 47 complaints are concerned, the first respondent-Commission directed the petitioner to send statement of particulars regarding those complaints.

2. The case of the petitioner is as follows:

The second respondent, a native of Puducherry, has made several applications/queries under the provisions of the Right to Information Act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as 'the RTI Act') to the Madras High Court, seeking information on various aspects. Out of several such applications/queries made by the second respondent, the first respondent has directed the petitioner to furnish the information as sought for by the second respondent in respect of the following six applications/queries:

(i) Details of action taken on his