SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Mad) 55

THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S. MANIKUMAR, M.GOVINDARAJ, JJ.
B.Janakiram - Appellants
vs.
The State of Tamilnadu, rep. by its Secretary to Government, Cooperation - Respondents
W.A.No.1330 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012 in W.A.No.1330 of 2012 and Rev. Application Nos.82 & 83 of 2009
Decided On : 04-01-2017

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. R.Krishnamoorthy
For the Respondent: Mr. L.P.Shanmugasundaram

Headnote:

The High Court of Madras held that the Registrar of Co-operative Societies has the authority to issue directions to co-operative societies to ensure proper implementation of co-operative production and other developmental programs and to secure the proper management of the business of any class of registered societies generally. The court also held that individual societies cannot enter into wage settlements with their employees under the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, without the approval of the Registrar of Co-operative Societies.

Fact of the Case:

The appellants, Periyar District Cooperative Land Development Bank Employee's Union, represented by its General Secretary, Erode District, and K. Selvaraj & two others, filed writ petitions challenging G.O. Ms. No. 186 Co-operation Food & Consumer Protection Department dated 16.08.2000 and the consequential orders passed by the Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Chennai, and the Special Officer, Harur Co-operative Primary Agricultural & Rural Development Bank Ltd., Harur, Dharmapuri District. The petitioners contended that the impugned orders were illegal and violated the rights of the employees of the co-operative societies.

Finding of the Court:

The High Court of Madras held that the Registrar of Co-operative Societies has the authority to issue directions to co-operative societies to ensure proper implementation of co-operative production and other developmental programs and to secure the proper management of the business of any class of registered societies generally. The court also held that individual societies cannot enter into wage settlements with their employees under the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, without the approval of the Registrar of Co-operative Societies.

Issues: 1. Whether the Registrar of Co-operative Societies has the authority to issue directions to co-operative societies to ensure proper implementation of co-operative production and other developmental programs and to secure the proper management of the business of any class of registered societies generally? 2. Whether individual societies can enter into wage settlements with their employees under the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, without the approval of the Registrar of Co-operative Societies?

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court held that the Registrar of Co-operative Societies has the authority to issue directions to co-operative societies to ensure proper implementation of co-operative production and other developmental programs and to secure the proper management of the business of any class of registered societies generally. This authority is derived from Section 181 of the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act, 1983, which empowers the Registrar to issue such directions if he is satisfied that in public interest or for the purpose of securing proper implementation of co-operative production and other developmental programmes and also to secure the proper management of the business of any class of registered societies generally or for preventing the conduct of any society which would otherwise be detrimental to the interest of its members or depositors or creditors such directions are imminently required. 2. The court held that individual societies cannot enter into wage settlements with their employees under the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, without the approval of the Registrar of Co-operative Societies. This is because Rule 149 of the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Rules, 1988, which deals with the conditions of service of paid officers and servants of societies, requires that every society shall, taking into account its nature of business, volume of transaction and financial position, adopt, with the prior approval of the Registrar of Societies, a Special by-law covering every condition of the society.

Final Decision: The High Court of Madras dismissed the writ petitions and upheld the impugned orders. The court also modified the common order made in W.A.Nos.1103 and 1104 of 2009 dated 25.09.2008 by rectifying the inadvertent mistake occurred at paragraph No.10 of the order, ie., the expression "with the prior approval of the State Government", be modified into that of, "with the prior approval of the Registrar of co-operative societies".

ORDER :

S. MANIKUMAR, J.

W.P.No.8801 of 2008 has been filed by Periyar District Cooperative Land Development Bank Employee's Union, represented by its General Secretary, Erode District for a writ of certiorarified mandamus, to quash G.O. Ms. No. 186 Co-operation Food & Consumer Protection Department dated 16.08.2000 and consequently, the said Union has prayed for a direction to respondents therein, to allow the salary and other allowances including terminal benefits in terms of the concluded settlement under Section 12(3) of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947.

2. W.P.No.8826 of 2008 has been filed by K. Selvaraj & two others for a similar prayer, to quash the said Government Order and the consequential order dated 03.03.2008 of the Special Officer, Harur Co-operative Primary Agricultural & Rural Development Bank Ltd., Harur, Dharmapuri District, 3rd respondent therein, in so far as the petitioners are concerned. The petitioners have also sought for a direction to the respondents therein, to allow the salary and other allowances including terminal benefits, in terms of the concluded settlement under Section 18(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947.

3. W.A.No.1330 of 2012, is against the order made in W.P.No.23496 of 2008, dated 17.04.2012, filed by Mr.B.Janakiraman and two others, for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to quash G.O.Ms.No.186, Co-operation Food & Consumer Protection Department, dated 16.08.2000 and the consequential proceedings, passed by the Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Chennai, the 2nd respondent therein, in his proceedings in Rc.No.165450/2003ARDB2, dated 20.07.2004 and consequently, to direct the respondents therein, to allow the salary, including allowances and the terminal benefits, in terms of the Concluded Settlements, under Section 12(3) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, dated 19.11.1998, with interest at the rate of 12% p.a., from the date of due, till payment.

4. Following a decision of the Hon'ble Division Bench in Tamil Nadu Vatta Koturavu Veetu Vasathi Sangangalin Anaithu Paniyalargal Madya Sangam (rep. by its General Secretary, R.Raghavendran) Vs. Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies (Housing) Cuddalore Circle, and others, reported in 2008 (2) LLN 236 = 2008 (2) MLJ 385, a learned Single Judge, by a common order, dismissed W.P.Nos.8801 and 8826 of 2008, dated 27.06.2008. Being aggrieved, Periyar District Cooperative Land Development Bank Employee's Union, represented by its General Secretary, Erode District, has filed W.A.No.1103 of 2008. Mr. K.Selvaraj and others have filed W.A.No.1104 of 2008.

5. After hearing the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, vide common order in W.A.Nos.1103 and 1104 of 2008 dated 25.09.2008, a Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court dismissed both the writ appeals, as hereunder.

"8. In the case of T.N.V.K.V.V.S.A.P.Madya Sangam v. Deputy Registrar of co-operative Societies [2008 (2) LLN 236], the validity of an order passed by the Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies (Housing) fell for consideration whereby the authorities directed the concerned Society to cancel the settlement made under Section 19(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, based on which, higher scale of pay was fixed and paid to the members of the petitioner Union (Sangam). In the said case, the Division Bench noticed the history for substitution of Rule 149 of the Rules and observed as under:

"In fact, Rule 149 of the Rules 1988 came into being by way of G.O.Ms.No.212 dated 4 January 1997, i.e., after the pronouncement of the Division Bench decision reported in Tiruchirapalli Hiruthayapuram Co-operative Bank Employees Union v. Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Tiruchirapalli (vide supra). On the basis of the judgment of the earlier Division bench, the State Government in order to restrain the individual societies entering into such wage settlements without reference t































































































































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top