IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
R.N. Manjula, J.
P. Krishnappa – Petitioner
Versus
Padmavathy – Respondent
C.R.P (PD).No. 1002 of 2022 & C.M.P.No. 5196 of 2022
Decided On : 08-07-2022
Domestic Violence - Limitation - Sec.3 of the Domestic Violence Act - Sec.31 of the Domestic Violence Act - Sec.468 of Cr.P.C - Continuing wrongs - [KEYWORD] - Domestic Violence - Sec.3, Sec.31, Sec.468
Fact of the Case:
The husband filed a Civil Revision Petition to strike off the domestic violence proceedings initiated by the wife, claiming it was barred by limitation as the complaint was filed beyond one year from the alleged date of occurrence. The wife alleged physical, verbal, emotional, and economical abuse and sought various reliefs under the Domestic Violence Act.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the Domestic Violence Act does not contemplate any limitation, and even if presumed, it would not apply to continuing wrongs. The court referred to a recent Supreme Court judgment to support this finding.
Issues: The issues revolved around the applicability of limitation in filing complaints under the Domestic Violence Act, especially in cases of continuing wrongs.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that limitation for filing complaints under the Domestic Violence Act would not apply to continuing wrongs, as clarified by a recent Supreme Court judgment.
Final Decision: The Civil Revision Petition was dismissed, and the court upheld the decision of the learned District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate to take cognizance of the domestic violence complaint.
Certainly! Please provide the legal document content so I can extract the key points and references accordingly.
JUDGMENT :
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to call for the records pertaining to the case in DV.No.5 of 2014 on the file of the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate No.I, Hosur, struck off the same.)
1. This Civil Revision Petition has been filed to struck off the proceedings pending before the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate-No.I, Hosur, pertaining to the case of in domestic violence in DV.No.5/2014.
2. Heard the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the perused the materials available on record.
3. The Revision Petitioner is the husband. Against him, the respondent/wife has preferred a domestic violence complaint and the same was taken on file and pending before the learned District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate-No.I, Hosur.
4. Now this petitioner has filed this Revision petition by claiming that the Domestic Violence Petition is barred by limitation, since the complaint has been given beyond a period of one year from the alleged date of the occurrence. It is further submitted that the petitioner and the respondent got separated and they were living separately for nearly 6 years before lodging the complaint; but the cognizance of the complaint was taken on 06.12.2014 and hence it is barred by limitation; since no enquiry or trial has been initiated in the domestic violence complaint and the complaint has been filed only to harass the revision petitioner and the same should be struck off.
5. On perusal of the complaint, it is seen that there are several allegations were made against the husband. Some of the allegations are categorized under verbal and emotional abuse, economical violence, dowry related harassment and other kinds of emotional violences in the complaint. Since the respondent/wife has alleged that she was driven out of the matrimonial home and she was not supported with any maintenance, the reliefs sought for in the domestic violence complaint are protection order, residential order, orders for maintenance and compensation.
6. The Act of -Domestic Violence- is defined under Sec.3 of the Domestic Violence Act and it reads as under:
3. Definition of domestic violence.—For the purposes of this Act, any act, omission or commission or conduct of the respondent shall constitute domestic violence in case it—
(a) harms or injures or endangers the health, safety, life, limb or well-being, whether mental or physical, of the aggrieved person or tends to do so and includes causing physical abuse, sexual abuse, verbal and emotional abuse and economic abuse; or
(b) harasses, harms, injures or endangers the aggrieved person with a view to coerce her or any other person related to her to meet any unlawful demand for any dowry or other property or valuable security; or
(c) has the effect of threatening the aggrieved person or any person related to her by any conduct mentioned in clause (a) or clause (b); or
(d) otherwise injures or causes harm, whether physical or mental, to the aggrieved person. Explanation I.—For the purposes of this section,—
(i) “physical abuse” means any act or conduct which is of such a nature as to cause bodily pain, harm, or danger to life, limb, or health or impair the health or development of the aggrieved person and includes assault, criminal intimidation and criminal force;
(ii) “sexual abuse” includes any conduct of a sexual nature that abuses, humiliates, degrades or otherwise violates the dignity of woman;
(iii) “verbal and emotional abuse” includes—
(a) insults, ridicule, humiliation, name calling and insults or ridicule specially with regard to not having a child or a male child; and
(b) repeated threats to cause physical pain to any person in whom the aggrieved person is interested.
(iv) “economic abuse” includes—
(a) deprivation of all or any economic or financial resources to which the aggrieved person is entitled under any la
The main legal point established in the judgment is that limitation for filing complaints under the Domestic Violence Act does not apply to continuing wrongs, as clarified by a recent Supreme Court j....
Limitations under Section 468 of the CrPC do not apply until there is a breach of an order issued under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act.
Point of law : Under Section 2(q) of the DV Act, the word respondent means any adult male person who is, or has been, in a domestic relationship with the aggrieved person and against whom the aggriev....
The settlement of disputes out of court renders judicial intervention unnecessary.
Cognizance of offence – Cognizance’ ought to be taken within specified period from commission of offence but complainant should not be put to prejudice, if for reasons beyond control of prosecuting a....
Allegations under domestic violence law must be specific and timely, as vague claims and unexplained delays undermine the complaint's validity.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.