S. M. SUBRAMANIAM
M. Balu – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Secretary, Department of School Education, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai – Respondent
ORDER :
The order of rejection, rejecting the claim of the writ petitioner for grant of incentive increment for acquiring the qualification of M.Phil in Physical Education, is under challenge in the present writ petition.
2. The petitioner states that he is working as Physical Director Grade-I and he acquired the qualification of M.Phil in Physical education. Accordingly, submitted an application for grant of incentive increment. The petitioner was initially sanctioned with the incentive increment and the competent authorities on verification found that there is no Government order to grant incentive increment for M.Phil in Physical Education during the relevant point of time.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner relied on G.O.Ms No. 324, Education, Science and Technology Department, dated 25.04.1995 and states that the relevant subject would be sufficient for the purpose of granting of incentive increment. The petitioner studied M.Phil in physical education which is relevant to the post of Physical Director Grade-I and therefore he is entitled for the benefit of incentive in
Union of India v. Kartick Chandra Mondal (2010) (2) SCC 422
Basavaraj and another vs Special Land Acquisition Officer reported in 2013 (14) SCC 81
Chandigarh Administration & Anr. v. Jagjit Singh & Anr.
M/s. Anand Button Ltd. v. State of Haryana & Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.