S. M. SUBRAMANIAM
Ulagamani – Appellant
Versus
Gnanasekar – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The Civil Revision Petition has been instituted, questioning the validity of the fair and decreetal order dated 3rd November 2022 passed in I.A. No. 1 of 2022 in O.S. No. 12 of 2019.
2. The Revision Petitioner is the defendant in the suit. The respondent instituted the suit for Partition. The suit was set ex-parte against the defendant on 16.08.2019. After a lapse of about 3 years, the revision petitioner/defendant filed an Interlocutory Application to condone the delay of about 1016 days in filing the petition to set aside the ex-parte order.
3. The petition to condone the delay of 1016 days was adjudicated by the trial Court and the trial Court found that the revision petitioner/defendant has failed to file the written statement and she was present, when ex-parte order was passed on 10.07.2019, but she has stated as if she was ill and could not attend the Court, which is false. The written statement was not filed, in spite of the fact that she was given sufficient opportunity. This petitioner has entered appearance in the final decree petition and has taken time falsely representing she has filed petition to set aside ex-parte decree. But the petition is filed after nearl
Ajit Singh Thakur Singh and Another vs. State of Gujarat
C. Subraniam vs. Tamil Nadu Housing Board Rep. by its Chairman and Managing Director
Kandaswamy and Others vs. Krishnamandiram Trust, Karur, by its Trustees and Others
N. Balakrishnan vs. M. Krishnamurthy
N. Balakrishnan vs. M. Krishnamurthy
Postmaster General and Others vs. Living Media India Limited and Another
Ram Nath Sao @ Ram Sahu and Others vs. Gobardhan Sap and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.